Abstract:Two configurations typical of fixed-wing aircraft are simulated with the actuator line method (ALM): a wing with winglets and a T-tail. The ALM is extensively used in rotor simulations to model the blades by body forces, which are calculated from airfoil data and the relative flow velocity. This method has not been used to simulate airplane aerodynamics, despite its advantage of allowing coarser grids. This may be credited to the failure of the uncorrected ALM to accurately predict forces near the tip of wings, even for simple configurations. The recently-proposed vortex-based smearing correction shows improved results, suggesting those limitations are part of the past. For the non-planar configurations studied in this work, differences between the ALM with the original smearing correction and a non-linear lifting line method (LL) are observed near the intersection of surfaces, because the circulation generated in the numerical simulation differs from the calculated corrected circulation. A vorticity magnitude correction is proposed, which improves the agreement between ALM and LL. This second-order correction resolves the ambiguity in the velocity used to define the lift force. The good results indicate that the improved ALM can be used for airplane aerodynamics, with an accuracy similar to the LL.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to solve the accuracy problems encountered when using the Actuator Line Method (ALM) to simulate the aerodynamics of non - planar wings of fixed - wing aircraft. Specifically, the traditional ALM has the following problems when simulating aircraft wings and tail fins: 1. **Inaccurate prediction of wing - tip forces**: The uncorrected ALM is not accurate enough in predicting the forces near the wing tip, especially when dealing with complex geometries. This problem limits the application of ALM in aircraft aerodynamics. 2. **Limitations of non - planar configurations**: For non - planar configurations (such as wings with winglets and T - shaped tail fins), the differences between ALM and the Nonlinear Lifting Line Method (LL) mainly occur at the surface junctions because the vorticity generated by numerical simulation is different from the calculated corrected vorticity. ### Solutions To solve the above problems, the paper proposes the following improvement measures: 1. **Vortex - Based Smearing Correction**: This correction method improves the accuracy of ALM by considering the differences between the induced velocities of ideal vortices and Gaussian - distributed vortices. This method has achieved good results in the simulation of rotating blades. 2. **Vorticity Magnitude Correction**: For non - planar wings (such as wings with winglets and T - shaped tail fins), a second - order correction method is proposed. This method corrects the vorticity magnitude generated in numerical simulation by adjusting the acting forces, thereby improving the consistency between ALM and LL methods. ### Main contributions - **Expanding the application range of ALM**: By introducing vorticity magnitude correction, ALM can more accurately simulate the aerodynamic characteristics of non - planar wings and tail fins, making it suitable for aerodynamic research of fixed - wing aircraft. - **Verifying the accuracy of ALM**: By comparing with the Nonlinear Lifting Line Method, it is proved that the improved ALM has high accuracy in simulating complex geometries. - **Providing new correction methods**: The proposed vorticity magnitude correction method is not only applicable to non - planar wings, but can also be applied to other scenarios where accurate simulation of vorticity distribution is required, such as rotating blades with winglets. ### Conclusions The paper shows the potential of the improved ALM in simulating the aerodynamics of non - planar wings of fixed - wing aircraft, especially when dealing with complex geometries. These improvements make ALM a viable low - to - medium - fidelity simulation method that can be used for aircraft aerodynamics research.

Simulating Airplane Aerodynamics with Body Forces: Actuator Line Method for Non-planar Wings

Unsteady Flow Simulation of a Variable-Sweep Morphing Aircraft Coupled with Flight Control System

Unsteady aerodynamic response of pitching airfoils represented by Gaussian body forces

On the simulation of a wing with detached end-plates using an actuator line based on an anisotropic Gaussian kernel

Combination of Advanced Actuator Line/Disk Model and High-Order Unstructured Finite Volume Solver for Helicopter Rotors

Simulating tip effects in vertical-axis wind turbines with the actuator line method

Actuator line model using simplified force calculation methods

A Combined Method of CFD Simulation and Modified Beddoes-Leishman Model to Predict the Dynamic Stall Characterizations of S809 Airfoil

Enhanced Unsteady Vortex Lattice Aerodynamics for Nonlinear Flexible Aircraft Dynamic Simulation

Unsteady lifting-line theory and the influence of wake vorticity on aerodynamic loads

Reliable method of aerodynamic analysis using computational fluid dynamics and scaled models in the development process of a Very Light Airplane

Experimental and Numerical Flutter Analysis Using Local Piston Theory with Viscous Correction

Deformable Blade Element and Unsteady Vortex Lattice Fluid-Structure Interaction Modeling of a 2D Flapping Wing

A Modification to the Enhanced Correction Factor Technique for the Subsonic Wing–Body Interference Model

Numerical Analysis Of Active Flow Control Around Airfoil By Synthetic Jet Technology In Low Reynolds Number

Nonlinear Aeroelastic Response Analysis of Wing with Flared Folding Wingtip

A novel 3D variational aeroelastic framework for flexible multibody dynamics: Application to bat-like flapping dynamics

Separated and vortical flow in aircraft aerodynamics: a CFD perspective

Unsteady Lifting-Line Theory for Camber Morphing Wings State-Space Aeroelastic Modeling

Unsteady aerodynamic modeling of Aerobat using lifting line theory and Wagner's function

Numerical analyses of a reference wing for combination of hybrid laminar flow control and variable camber