What is in a Name: Defining -High Entropy- Oxides

Matthew Brahlek,Maria Gazda,Veerle Keppens,Alessandro R. Mazza,Scott J. McCormack,Aleksandra Mielewczyk-Gryń,Brianna Musico,Katharine Page,Christina Rost,Susan B. Sinnott,Cormac Toher,Thomas Z. Ward,Ayako Yamamoto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0122727

2022-11-04

Abstract:High entropy oxides are emerging as an exciting new avenue to design highly tailored functional behaviors that have no traditional counterparts. Study and application of these materials are bringing together scientists and engineers from physics, chemistry, and materials science. The diversity of each of these disciplines comes with perspectives and jargon that may be confusing to those outside of the individual fields, which can result in miscommunication of important aspects of research. In this perspective, we provide examples of research and characterization taken from these different fields to provide a framework for classifying the differences between compositionally complex oxides, high entropy oxides, and entropy stabilized oxides, which is intended to bring a common language to this emerging area. We highlight the critical importance of understanding a materials crystallinity, composition, and mixing length scales in determining its true definition.

Materials Science,Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics,Computational Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is how to define "High Entropy Oxides" (HEOs). Specifically, the authors point out that there are differences in the understanding and definition of high entropy oxides among scientists and engineers in different disciplines, leading to terminological confusion and misunderstandings in research. Therefore, this paper aims to provide a unified framework to classify and define different types of complex oxides, including Compositionally Complex Oxides (CCMs), High Entropy Oxides (HEOs), and Entropy Stabilized Oxides (ESOs), to facilitate communication and collaboration among researchers from different fields.

### Main Issues:
1. **Terminological Confusion**: The current use of terminology regarding high entropy oxides is inconsistent, making it difficult for different researchers to communicate effectively.
2. **Unclear Definitions**: There is a lack of clear standards to distinguish high entropy oxides from other complex oxides, particularly in how to quantify and evaluate the entropy of materials.
3. **Multidisciplinary Intersection**: The research on high entropy oxides involves multiple fields such as physics, chemistry, and materials science. Each field has different research methods and terminology, necessitating a common language to promote interdisciplinary collaboration.

### Solutions:
1. **Providing a Classification Framework**: This paper proposes a classification framework that divides complex oxides into Compositionally Complex Oxides (CCMs), High Entropy Oxides (HEOs), and Entropy Stabilized Oxides (ESOs), and explains the characteristics and definitions of each type of material in detail.
2. **Emphasizing Key Parameters**: It emphasizes the importance of crystallinity, composition, and mixing length scales in defining the type of material.
3. **Combining Theory and Experiment**: By combining theoretical analysis and experimental data, the paper discusses how to evaluate and quantify the entropy of materials and the impact of these parameters on material performance.

Through these methods, the authors hope to provide a clearer and more unified definition for the research on high entropy oxides, thereby promoting the further development of this emerging field.