Abstract:Copyright and licensing of scientific data, internationally, are complex and present legal barriers to data sharing, integration and reuse, and therefore restrict the most efficient transfer and discovery of scientific knowledge. Much data are included within scientific journal articles, their published tables, additional files (supplementary material) and reference lists. However, these data are usually published under licenses which are not appropriate for data. Creative Commons CC0 is an appropriate and increasingly accepted method for dedicating data to the public domain, to enable data reuse with the minimum of restrictions. BioMed Central is committed to working towards implementation of open data-compliant licensing in its publications. Here we detail a protocol for implementing a combined Creative Commons Attribution license (for copyrightable material) and Creative Commons CC0 waiver (for data) agreement for content published in peer-reviewed open access journals. We explain the differences between legal requirements for attribution in copyright, and cultural requirements in scholarship for giving individuals credit for their work through citation. We argue that publishing data in scientific journals under CC0 will have numerous benefits for individuals and society, and yet will have minimal implications for authors and minimal impact on current publishing and research workflows. We provide practical examples and definitions of data types, such as XML and tabular data, and specific secondary use cases for published data, including text mining, reproducible research, and open bibliography. We believe this proposed change to the current copyright and licensing structure in science publishing will help clarify what users – people and machines – of the published literature can do, legally, with journal articles and make research using the published literature more efficient. We further believe this model could be adopted across multiple publishers, and invite comment on this article from all stakeholders in scientific research.

Comments on SPD-41 software licensing requirements

Recommendations to clarify NASA open source requirements

Revisiting Linus's Law: Benefits and Challenges of Open Source Software Peer Review.

Behind Linus's law: A preliminary analysis of open source software peer review practices in Mozilla and Python

Open-Source Software in the Sciences: The Challenge of User Support

Catch the Butterfly: Peeking into the Terms and Conflicts among SPDX Licenses

Open Source Software (OSS) Transparency for DoD Acquisition

Improving Software Citation and Credit

Freedom From Restriction, Freedom Of A Restriction: A Comparison Of Some Open Source Software Licenses

FAIR-USE4OS: Guidelines for Creating Impactful Open-Source Software

Summary of the First Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences (WSSSPE1)

"The Law Doesn't Work Like a Computer": Exploring Software Licensing Issues Faced by Legal Practitioners

Understanding and Remediating Open-Source License Incompatibilities in the PyPI Ecosystem

A Fresh Look at FAIR for Research Software

Open Source Software Opportunities and Risks

Open by default: a proposed copyright license and waiver agreement for open access research and data in peer-reviewed journals

Report on the Second Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences (WSSSPE2)

Assessing open source software as a scholarly contribution

An Open Community-Driven Model For Sustainable Research Software: Sustainable Research Software Institute

Change Management and Version Control of Scientific Applications