Abstract:We are concerned with rigid analytic geometry in the general setting of Henselian fields K with separated analytic structure, whose theory was developed by Cluckers–Lipshitz–Robinson. It unifies earlier work and approaches of numerous mathematicians. Separated analytic structures admit reasonable relative quantifier elimination in a suitable analytic language. However, the rings of global analytic functions with two kinds of variables seem not to have good algebraic properties such as Noetherianity or excellence. Therefore, the usual global resolution of singularities from rigid analytic geometry is no longer at our disposal. Our main purpose is to give a definable version of the canonical desingularization algorithm (the hypersurface case) due to Bierstone–Milman so that both of these powerful tools are available in the realm of non-Archimedean analytic geometry at the same time. It will be carried out within a category of definable, strong analytic manifolds and maps, which is more flexible than that of affinoid varieties and maps. Strong analytic objects are those definable ones that remain analytic over all fields elementarily equivalent to K. This condition may be regarded as a kind of symmetry imposed on ordinary analytic objects. The strong analytic category makes it possible to apply a model-theoretic compactness argument in the absence of the ordinary topological compactness. On the other hand, our closedness theorem enables application of resolution of singularities to topological problems involving the topology induced by valuation. Eventually, these three results will be applied to such issues as the existence of definable retractions or extending continuous definable functions. The established results remain valid for strictly convergent analytic structures, whose classical examples are complete, rank one valued fields with the Tate algebras of strictly convergent power series. The earlier techniques and approaches to the purely topological versions of those issues cannot be carried over to the definable settings because, among others, non-Archimedean geometry over non-locally compact fields suffers from lack of definable Skolem functions.

Around definable types in $p$-adically closed fields

Abelian Groups Definable in P-Adically Closed Fields

One-dimensional subgroups and connected components in non-abelian $p$-adic definable groups

On Groups with Definable F-Generics Definable in P-Adically Closed Fields

A Note on Groups Definable in the P-Adic Field

On Definable F-Generic Groups and Minimal Flows in P-Adically Closed Fields

Definably semisimple groups interpretable in $p$-adically closed fields

On groups interpretable in various valued fields

Some Model Theory and Topological Dynamics of $P$-Adic Algebraic Groups

On definable groups and D -groups in certain fields with a generic derivation

Definably Topological Dynamics of $P$-Adic Algebraic Groups

Semisimple groups interpretable in various valued fields

On groups and fields interpretable in torsion-free hyperbolic groups

ON NON-COMPACT P-Adic DEFINABLE GROUPS

On the undefinability of pathological Banach spaces

Generic differentiability and $P$-minimal groups

Definable Transformation to Normal Crossings over Henselian Fields with Separated Analytic Structure

Definable Topological Dynamics for Trigonalizable Algebraic Groups over Qp

On Minimal Flows and Definable Amenability in Some Distal NIP Theories

On Minimal Flows of Commutative P-Adic Groups

One-dimensional F-definable sets in F((t))