Abstract:We prove a certain uniform version of the Shafarevich Conjecture. As a corollary, we prove the Rasmussen-Tamagawa Conjecture for a particular class of abelian varieties $A$ defined over a number $K$ of dimension $g$ having everywhere potential good reduction, in particular, for any finite place $v$ of $K$ the localization $A_v:=A\times_{\mathrm{Spec}(K)}\mathrm{Spec}(K_v)$ has either good reduction or {\it totally bad reduction} (connected component $\tilde{\mathcal{A}}_v^0$ of the special fibre $\tilde{\mathcal{A}}_v$ of the Néron model $\mathcal{A}_v$ at $v$ is an affine group scheme over the residue field $k_v$ at $v$) and has good reduction over a quadratic extension of $K_v$.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the proof of a special case of the Rasmussen - Tamagawa conjecture. Specifically, the author studied a certain class of abelian varieties, which are defined over a number field \(K\) and have a certain potential good reduction property.
### Specific problem description
1. **Background and motivation**:
- A conjecture (Conjecture 1.1) proposed by Rasmussen and Tamagawa states that: for a number field \(K\) and a positive integer \(g\), when the prime number \(\ell\) is large enough, the set \(A(K, g, \ell)\) is empty. Here \(A(K, g, \ell)\) represents the \(K\)-isomorphism classes of abelian varieties \(A\) that satisfy the following conditions:
- The dimension of \(A\) is \(g\);
- \(A\) has good reduction outside \(\ell\);
- \(K(A[\ell])/K(\mu_\ell)\) is an \(\ell\)-extension.
2. **Main contributions of the paper**:
- The author proved that for a certain class of abelian varieties \(A\in Z(K, g)\), that is, those abelian varieties that either have good reduction or have completely bad reduction at each finite place \(v\) and obtain good reduction over a quadratic extension, the above conjecture holds.
- Specifically, they proved that for a large enough prime number \(\ell\), the set \(M(K, g, \ell)\) is empty, and thus deduced that \(A_{\text{pot}}(K, g, \ell)\) is also empty. Here \(M(K, g, \ell)\) is a subset of \(Z(K, g)\) that contains those abelian varieties that satisfy certain additional conditions.
3. **Key results**:
- **Theorem 1.4**: For a large enough prime number \(\ell\), the set \(M(K, g, \ell)=\emptyset\).
- **Corollary 1.5**: For a given number field \(K\) and a positive integer \(g\), the set \(\bar{M}(K, g):=\bigcup_\ell\bar{M}(K, g, \ell)\) is finite.
- **Corollary 1.6**: For a large enough prime number \(\ell\), the set \(A_{\text{pot}}(K, g, \ell)\) is empty, so \(A_{\text{pot}}(K, g):=\bigcup_\ell A_{\text{pot}}(K, g, \ell)\) is finite.
### Mathematical concepts involved
- **Abelian varieties**: An important class of objects in algebraic geometry with a group structure.
- **Potential good reduction**: It means that there exists a certain finite extension such that the abelian variety has good reduction over this extension.
- **Tate module**: The \(\ell\)-adic Tate module on an abelian variety, which is used to study the \(\ell\)-adic representation of the abelian variety.
- **Galois representations**: Representations obtained by the action of the Galois group on the Tate module.
- **Weil weights**: A concept related to the roots of the characteristic polynomial of the Frobenius element, which is used to describe the purity of the representation.
### Summary
This paper, by introducing new technical means, especially by using the potential good reduction property and Galois...