Abstract:The quantum approximate optimisation algorithm (QAOA) is at the core of many scenarios that aim to combine the power of quantum computers and classical high-performance computing appliances for combinatorial optimisation. Several obstacles challenge concrete benefits now and in the foreseeable future: Imperfections quickly degrade algorithmic performance below practical utility; overheads arising from alternating between classical and quantum primitives can counter any advantage; and the choice of parameters or algorithmic variant can substantially influence runtime and result quality. Selecting the optimal combination is a non-trivial issue, as it not only depends on user requirements, but also on details of the hardware and software stack. Appropriate automation can lift the burden of choosing optimal combinations for end-users: They should not be required to understand technicalities like differences between QAOA variants, required number of QAOA layers, or necessary measurement samples. Yet, they should receive best-possible satisfaction of their non-functional requirements, be it performance or other. We determine factors that affect solution quality and temporal behaviour of four QAOA variants using comprehensive density-matrix-based simulations targeting three widely studied optimisation problems. Our simulations consider ideal quantum computation, and a continuum of scenarios troubled by realistic imperfections. Our quantitative results, accompanied by a comprehensive reproduction package, show strong differences between QAOA variants that can be pinpointed to narrow and specific effects. We identify influential co-variables and relevant non-functional quality goals that, we argue, mark the relevant ingredients for designing appropriate software engineering abstraction mechanisms and automated tool-chains for devising quantum solutions from high-level problem specifications.

Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm in Non-Markovian Quantum Systems

Noise-Aware Distributed Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm on Near-term Quantum Hardware

Effects of Quantum Noise on Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

QAOA Performance in Noisy Devices: The Effect of Classical Optimizers and Ansatz Depth

The effect of classical optimizers and Ansatz depth on QAOA performance in noisy devices

Bayesian Optimization for QAOA

Evaluating Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm: A Case Study

Approximating under the Influence of Quantum Noise and Compute Power

Multiscale Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

Trainability Analysis of Quantum Optimization Algorithms from a Bayesian Lens

Robust Optimization for Quantum Reinforcement Learning Control Using Partial Observations

A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm for continuous problems

Improving Quantum Approximate Optimization by Noise-Directed Adaptive Remapping

Quantum approximate optimization via learning-based adaptive optimization

An adaptive quantum approximate optimization algorithm for solving combinatorial problems on a quantum computer

A Review on Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and its Variants

Quantum Approximate Optimization: A Computational Intelligence Perspective

Mean-Field Approximate Optimization Algorithm

An introduction to variational quantum algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems

Training the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm without access to a Quantum Processing Unit