Abstract:When ${\cal{D}}:\xi \rightarrow \eta$ is a linear OD or PD operator, a "direct problem" is to find compatibility conditions (CC) as an operator ${\cal{D}}_1:\eta \rightarrow \zeta$ such that ${\cal{D}}\xi=\eta$ implies ${\cal{D}}_1\eta=0$. When ${\cal{D}}$ is involutive, the procedure provides successive first order involutive operators ${\cal{D}}_1, ... , {\cal{D}}_n$ in dimension $n$. Conversely, when ${\cal{D}}_1$ is given, a much more difficult " inverse problem " is to look for an operator ${\cal{D}}: \xi \rightarrow \eta$ having the generating CC ${\cal{D}}_1\eta=0$. This is possible when the differential module defined by ${\cal{D}}_1$ is " {\it torsion-free} ", one shall say that ${\cal{D}}_1$ is parametrized by ${\cal{D}}$. The systematic use of the adjoint of a differential operator provides a constructive test. A control system is controllable {\it if and only if} it can be parametrized. Accordingly, the controllability of any OD or PD control system is a " {\it built in} " property not depending on the choice of the input and output variables among the system variables. In the OD case when ${\cal{D}}_1$ is formally surjective, controllability just amounts to the injectivity of $ad({\cal{D}}_1)$. Among applications, the parametrization of the Cauchy stress operator has attracted many famous scientists from G.B. Airy in 1863 for $n=2$ to A. Einstein in 1915 for $n=4$. We prove that all these works are already explicitly using the self-adjoint Einstein operator {\it which cannot be parametrized} and are based on a confusion between the $div$ operator induced from the Bianchi operator ${\cal{D}}_2$ and the Cauchy operator, adjoint of the Killing operator ${\cal{D}}$ for an arbitrary $n$. This purely mathematical result deeply questions the origin and existence of gravitational waves.

A quantitative and constructive proof of Willems' Fundamental Lemma and its implications

Willems' fundamental lemma for linear descriptor systems and its use for data-driven output-feedback MPC

An input-output continuous-time version of Willems' lemma

Trajectory Tracking and Disturbance Rejection Control of Random Linear Systems

Willems' Fundamental Lemma for Nonlinear Systems with Koopman Linear Embedding

Proof of Proposition 3.1 in the paper titled "Backstepping control of a class of space-time-varying linear parabolic PDEs via time invariant kernel functions''

Trajectory Tracking Control for Robot Manipulators with Bounded Inputs Based on the Singular Perturbation Theory

On the design of persistently exciting inputs for data-driven control of linear and nonlinear systems

A continuous-time fundamental lemma and its application in data-driven optimal control

On a Stochastic Fundamental Lemma and Its Use for Data-Driven Optimal Control

Robust Control of Piecewise Affine System with Constrained Input and Parameter Perturbation

Formulas for Data-driven Control: Stabilization, Optimality and Robustness

Non-Atkinson perturbations of nonautonomous linear hamiltonian systems: exponential dichotomy and nonoscillation

On the Computation of Controlled Invariant and Output Invisible Subspaces for Parameter-dependent Systems

Pitman's discrete $2M-X$ theorem for arbitrary initial laws and continuous time limits

Control Theory and Parametrizations of Linear Partial Differential Operators

Deep Hankel matrices with random elements

Composite Adaptive Control for Anti-Unwinding Attitude Maneuvers: An Exponential Stability Result Without Persistent Excitation

Distributions and controllability problems (I)

Bilinear Controllability of a Class of Advection-Diffusion-Reaction Systems

The exponential turnpike property for periodic linear quadratic optimal control problems in infinite dimension