Abstract:<ol class=""><li>Life history tradeoffs are important coexistence mechanisms in plant communities. In particular, a tradeoff between seed quality and seed output may explain coexistence among species with a wide variety of seed sizes in heterogeneous landscapes with varying degrees of local stresses such as shade, drought, and browsing.</li><li>Under spatially implicit formulations of the tolerance‐fecundity tradeoff, species diversity is only bounded by community size and environmental heterogeneity. However, these formulations leave unanswered the question of how dispersal limitation, an important aspect of real communities, impacts the ability of the tolerance‐fecundity tradeoff to support coexistence.</li><li>Here we show using stochastic cellular automata that coexistence under the tolerance‐fecundity tradeoff in a spatially structured landscape is strongly modulated by the interactions between the spatial scales of species dispersal and environmental variability. Specifically, coexistence in a patchy landscape is higher under short dispersal scales relative to the scale of environmental variation. These conditions allow species to segregate spatially and thus avoid interspecific competition.</li><li>In addition to dispersal limitation, coexistence under the tolerance‐fecundity tradeoff is promoted by a sharp drop in tolerance as local environmental stress increases, a high overall seed output across species, local homogeneity in environmental conditions, and weak age structure in fertility. In particular, coexistence is much higher when species have full tolerance to stress levels below a threshold and zero tolerance above that threshold, with nothing in between. This steep gradient contributes to coexistence because it maximizes niche separation between similar species.</li><li><i>Synthesis</i>. When plants compete for space, dispersal limitation and landscape spatial structure can conspire to boost coexistence and diversity. Our results show that the tolerance fecundity tradeoff is a strong niche differentiation mechanism when species experience a well‐defined distinction between suitable and unsuitable environments, and supports higher diversity when dispersal scales are shorter than scales of variation in the environment. We conclude that the tradeoff is more likely to be a relevant coexistence mechanism in the context of large‐scale environmental variation, such as topography, than small‐scale variation, such as in litter cover and canopy shading. </li></ol>

On the role of reduced habitat in the phase transition of a stochastic model for seed dispersal

Stochastic model of seed dispersal with homogeneous and non-homogeneous Poisson processes under habitat reduction conditions

Tipping Points in Seed Dispersal Mutualism Driven by Environmental Stochasticity

Bounding Seed Loss from Isolated Habitat Patches

Stochastic population growth in spatially heterogeneous environments

Competition for space in a structured landscape: The effect of seed limitation on coexistence under a tolerance‐fecundity trade‐off

A branching process model for dormancy and seed banks in randomly fluctuating environments

Habitat loss-induced tipping points in metapopulations with facilitation

The Evolution of Conditional Dispersal Strategies in Spatially Heterogeneous Habitats.

Dispersal in stable habitats

Optimal Dispersal Strategy for a Stage-Structured Population Model in Discrete Periodic Habitat

Trade‐off between seed dispersal in space and time

Seed dispersal by wind decreases when plants are water‐stressed, potentially counteracting species coexistence and niche evolution

Evolutionarily Stable and Convergent Stable Strategies in Reaction–Diffusion Models for Conditional Dispersal

Group Dispersal Modelling Revisited

Uniform dispersion in growth models on homogeneous trees

A Stochastic Model to Predict Seed Dispersal in Linear and Stokes Waves

Coexistence and Bistability of a Competition Model with Mixed Dispersal Strategy

On a Population Model in Discrete Periodic Habitat. I. Spreading Speed and Optimal Dispersal Strategy

Coexistence of competitors in deterministic and stochastic patchy environments