Abstract:Differential privacy is the state-of-the-art formal definition for data release under strong privacy guarantees. A variety of mechanisms have been proposed in the literature for releasing the output of numeric queries (e.g., the Laplace mechanism and smooth sensitivity mechanism). Those mechanisms guarantee differential privacy by adding noise to the true query's output. The amount of noise added is calibrated by the notions of global sensitivity and local sensitivity of the query that measure the impact of the addition or removal of an individual on the query's output. Mechanisms that use local sensitivity add less noise and, consequently, have a more accurate answer. However, although there has been some work on generic mechanisms for releasing the output of non-numeric queries using global sensitivity (e.g., the Exponential mechanism), the literature lacks generic mechanisms for releasing the output of non-numeric queries using local sensitivity to reduce the noise in the query's output. In this work, we remedy this shortcoming and present the local dampening mechanism . We adapt the notion of local sensitivity for the non-numeric setting and leverage it to design a generic non-numeric mechanism. We provide theoretical comparisons to the exponential mechanism and show under which conditions the local dampening mechanism is more accurate than the exponential mechanism. We illustrate the effectiveness of the local dampening mechanism by applying it to three diverse problems: (i) percentile selection problem. We report the p -th element in the database; (ii) Influential node analysis. Given an influence metric, we release the top-k most influential nodes while preserving the privacy of the relationship between nodes in the network; (iii) Decision tree induction. We provide a private adaptation to the ID3 algorithm to build decision trees from a given tabular dataset. Experimental evaluation shows that we can reduce the error for percentile selection application up to , reduce the use of privacy budget by 2 to 4 orders of magnitude for influential node analysis application, and increase accuracy up to for decision tree induction when compared to global sensitivity-based approaches. Finally, to illustrate the scalability of our local dampening mechanism, we empirically evaluate its runtime performance for the influential node analysis problem and show a sub-quadratic behavior.

Widespread Underestimation of Sensitivity in Differentially Private Libraries and How to Fix It

Do I Get the Privacy I Need? Benchmarking Utility in Differential Privacy Libraries

Instance-Specific Asymmetric Sensitivity in Differential Privacy

Preserving differential privacy under finite-precision semantics

On Learning Cluster Coefficient of Private Networks

"I inherently just trust that it works": Investigating Mental Models of Open-Source Libraries for Differential Privacy

Are We There Yet? Timing and Floating-Point Attacks on Differential Privacy Systems

Sensitivity estimation for differentially private query processing

On the Statistical Complexity of Estimation and Testing under Privacy Constraints

Partial sensitivity analysis in differential privacy

Statistical Inference in the Differential Privacy Model

Average-Case Averages: Private Algorithms for Smooth Sensitivity and Mean Estimation

A New Analysis of Differential Privacy's Generalization Guarantees

Differential Privacy on Finite Computers

Secure Random Sampling in Differential Privacy

Differentially Private Algorithms for Statistical Verification of Cyber-Physical Systems

Local dampening: differential privacy for non-numeric queries via local sensitivity

The Cost of Privacy: Optimal Rates of Convergence for Parameter Estimation with Differential Privacy

DP-Auditorium: a Large Scale Library for Auditing Differential Privacy

Convergence Rates for Differentially Private Statistical Estimation

Differential Privacy: An Economic Method for Choosing Epsilon