Abstract:Purpose: Increased attention to improving a culture of belonging in clinical learning environments has led to various approaches to addressing microaggressions. However, most approaches in the literature focus on responding or reacting to microaggressions with insufficient attention to building trust before microaggressions might occur. Research on microaggressions in clinical learning environments suggests anticipatory or pre-emptive conversations about microaggressions may foster greater trust. In this study, the authors explored how diverse participants perceived the experience of anticipatory conversations about potential microaggressions. Overall, the authors sought to gain a deeper understanding of how pre-emptive and anticipatory conversations may influence an organization's approach to addressing microaggressions in clinical learning environments. Methods: The authors utilized constructivist grounded theory methodology and conducted individual qualitative interviews with 21 participants in an academic department within a larger health sciences center in the United States. Results: Findings suggest that anticipatory conversations about microaggressions were challenging due to existing norms in dynamic clinical learning and working environments. Participants shared that the idea of anticipating microaggressions elicited dissonance. Conversations about microaggressions could potentially be facilitated through leaders who role model vulnerability, organizational supports, and an individualized approach for each team member and their role within a complex hierarchical organization. Discussion: Anticipating and addressing microaggressions in clinical learning environments holds tremendous potential, however, any conversations about personal identity remain challenging in medical and healthcare environments. This study suggests that any attempts to address microaggressions requires attention to cultural norms within healthcare environments and the ways that hierarchical organizations can constrain individual agency.

"Y'all are just too sensitive": A computational ethics approach to understanding how prejudice against marginalized communities becomes epistemic belief

The Ethics of Microaggression

Is microaggression an oxymoron? A mixed methods study on attitudes toward racial microaggressions among United States university students

Conformism, Ignorance & Injustice: AI as a Tool of Epistemic Oppression

Biased processing and opinion polarization: experimental refinement of argument communication theory in the context of the energy debate

Making a Microaggression: Using Big Data and Qualitative Analysis to Map the Reproduction and Disruption of Microaggressions through Social Media

It is Challenging to Shift the Norm: Exploring how to Anticipate and Address Microaggressions in Clinical Learning Environments

Pushing Back Against the Microaggression Pushback in Academic Psychology: Reflections on a Concept-Creep Paradox

Is Carla grumpy? Analysis of peer evaluations to explore microaggressions and other marginalizing behaviors in engineering student teams

People, posts, and platforms: reducing the spread of online toxicity by contextualizing content and setting norms

AI Within Online Discussions: Rational, Civil, Privileged?

Disentangling Perceptions of Offensiveness: Cultural and Moral Correlates

Authenticity and exclusion: social media algorithms and the dynamics of belonging in epistemic communities

The Need for Understanding and Addressing Microaggressions in the Workplace

After Pierce and Sue: A Revised Racial Microaggressions Taxonomy

Along the Margins: Marginalized Communities' Ethical Concerns about Social Platforms

Laissez-Faire Harms: Algorithmic Biases in Generative Language Models

Provocation: Who benefits from "inclusion" in Generative AI?

Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approaches

Microaggression: Conceptual and scientific issues

Whose Knowledge is Valued?: Epistemic Injustice in CSCW Applications