Abstract:As the quantum computing community gravitates towards understanding the practical benefits of quantum computers, having a clear definition and evaluation scheme for assessing practical quantum advantage in the context of specific applications is paramount. Generative modeling, for example, is a widely accepted natural use case for quantum computers, and yet has lacked a concrete approach for quantifying success of quantum models over classical ones. In this work, we construct a simple and unambiguous approach to probe practical quantum advantage for generative modeling by measuring the algorithm's generalization performance. Using the sample-based approach proposed here, any generative model, from state-of-the-art classical generative models such as generative adversarial networks (GANs) to quantum models such as quantum circuit born machines, can be evaluated under the same conditions on a concrete well-defined framework. In contrast to other sample-based metrics for probing practical generalization, we leverage constrained optimization problems (e.g., cardinality-constrained problems) and use these discrete datasets to define specific metrics capable of unambiguously measuring the quality of the samples and the model's generalization capabilities for generating data beyond the training set, but still within the valid solution space. Additionally, our metrics can diagnose trainability issues such as mode collapse and overfitting, as we illustrate when comparing GANs to quantum-inspired models built out of tensor networks. Our simulation results show that our quantum-inspired models have up to a 68 times enhancement in generating unseen unique and valid samples compared to the GANs explored here, and a ratio of 61:2 for generating samples with better quality than those observed in the training set. We foresee these metrics as valuable tools for rigorously defining practical quantum advantage in the domain of generative modeling, where finding a winning model remains an ongoing challenge as new architectures are developed. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.044032 © 2024 American Physical Society

Bandwidth Enables Generalization in Quantum Kernel Models

Numerical evidence against advantage with quantum fidelity kernels on classical data

Exponential concentration in quantum kernel methods

Towards understanding the power of quantum kernels in the NISQ era

A Hyperparameter Study for Quantum Kernel Methods

Power Characterization of Noisy Quantum Kernels

CDQKL: Consensus-Based Distributed Quantum Kernel Learning

Quantum Kernel Machine Learning With Continuous Variables

Generalization despite overfitting in quantum machine learning models

Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training data

Benchmarking quantum machine learning kernel training for classification tasks

Quantum kernels with Gaussian state encoding for machine learning

Information-theoretic generalization bounds for learning from quantum data

Data-Dependent Generalization Bounds for Parameterized Quantum Models Under Noise

Quantum machine learning beyond kernel methods

Quantum machine learning of large datasets using randomized measurements

Provable Advantage in Quantum Phase Learning via Quantum Kernel Alphatron

Quantum kernels with squeezed-state encoding for machine learning

Strong Generalization in Quantum Neural Networks

Generalization metrics for practical quantum advantage in generative models

Covariant quantum kernels for data with group structure