Abstract:We study the communication complexity of dominant strategy implementations of combinatorial auctions. We start with two domains that are generally considered "easy": multi-unit auctions with decreasing marginal values and combinatorial auctions with gross substitutes valuations. For both domains we have fast algorithms that find the welfare-maximizing allocation with communication complexity that is poly-logarithmic in the input size. This immediately implies that welfare maximization can be achieved in ex-post equilibrium with no significant communication cost, by using VCG payments. In contrast, we show that in both domains the communication complexity of any dominant strategy implementation that achieves the optimal welfare is polynomial in the input size. We then move on to studying the approximation ratios achievable by dominant strategy mechanisms. For multi-unit auctions with decreasing marginal values, we provide a dominant-strategy communication FPTAS. For combinatorial auctions with general valuations, we show that there is no dominant strategy mechanism that achieves an approximation ratio better than $m^{1-\epsilon}$ that uses $poly(m,n)$ bits of communication, where $m$ is the number of items and $n$ is the number of bidders. In contrast, a \emph{randomized} dominant strategy mechanism that achieves an $O(\sqrt m)$ approximation with $poly(m,n)$ communication is known. This proves the first gap between computationally efficient deterministic dominant strategy mechanisms and randomized ones. En route, we answer an open question on the communication cost of implementing dominant strategy mechanisms for more than two players, and also solve some open problems in the area of simultaneous combinatorial auctions.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to the communication complexity in dominant - strategy mechanism design in combinatorial auctions. Specifically, the authors study the communication complexity of achieving dominant - strategy implementation in combinatorial auctions and compare it with the communication cost under ex - post equilibrium. The main objective of the paper is to determine whether the communication cost of dominant - strategy implementation is significantly higher than that under ex - post equilibrium. The paper focuses on two areas that are generally considered "simple": 1. **Multi - unit auctions**: where the valuations have decreasing marginal values. 2. **Combinatorial auctions**: where the valuations have gross substitutes valuations. For these two areas, the authors find that: - In multi - unit auctions, if the valuations have decreasing marginal values, the communication complexity of any dominant - strategy mechanism that achieves optimal welfare is polynomial in the input size. - In combinatorial auctions, even if the valuations have gross substitutes valuations, the communication complexity of any dominant - strategy mechanism that achieves optimal welfare is exponential in the input size. In contrast, under ex - post equilibrium, optimal welfare allocation can be achieved with a logarithmic communication complexity by using VCG payment methods. Furthermore, the paper also explores the approximation ratios that dominant - strategy mechanisms can achieve in these areas. For example, in multi - unit auctions, the author provides a fully polynomial - time approximation scheme (FPTAS) for dominant - strategy. In combinatorial auctions with general valuations, it is proved that there is no dominant - strategy mechanism with polynomial communication complexity that can achieve an approximation ratio better than $m^{1 - \epsilon}$. Overall, by analyzing different types of mechanism designs (dominant - strategy vs. ex - post equilibrium), this paper reveals that there are significant differences in the communication complexity required to achieve optimal welfare or approximately optimal welfare in certain auction areas. This provides a new perspective for understanding the communication cost in mechanism design.

On the Hardness of Dominant Strategy Mechanism Design

Impossibilities for Obviously Strategy-Proof Mechanisms

Welfare and Profit Maximization with Production Costs

On the Competition Complexity of Dynamic Mechanism Design

On the Computational Complexity of Mechanism Design in Single-Crossing Settings

The Complexity of Optimal Mechanism Design

The Communication Complexity of Payment Computation

Approximating Optimal Combinatorial Auctions for Complements Using Restricted Welfare Maximization.

Quantum Communication Complexity of Classical Auctions

Low communication protocols for fair allocation of indivisible goods

Bidding Strategies for VCG Mechanism with Computational Complexity

Breaking the Logarithmic Barrier for Truthful Combinatorial Auctions with Submodular Bidders

Rounds vs. Communication Tradeoffs for Maximal Independent Sets

Auctions with Severely Bounded Communication

The Communication Complexity of Optimization

The Cost of Simple Bidding in Combinatorial Auctions

Collusive Dominant-Strategy Truthfulness

Approximately Efficient Two-Sided Combinatorial Auctions

Revisiting the Foundations of Dominant-Strategy Mechanisms

Bayesian auctions with efficient queries

Combinatorial Auctions without Money