Abstract:The Meyer-Miller (MM) classical vibronic (electronic + nuclear) Hamiltonian for electronically non-adiabatic dynamics-as used, for example, with the recently developed symmetrical quasiclassical (SQC) windowing model-can be written in either a diabatic or an adiabatic representation of the electronic degrees of freedom, the two being a canonical transformation of each other, thus giving the same dynamics. Although most recent applications of this SQC/MM approach have been carried out in the diabatic representation-because most of the benchmark model problems that have exact quantum results available for comparison are typically defined in a diabatic representation-it will typically be much more convenient to work in the adiabatic representation, e.g., when using Born-Oppenheimer potential energy surfaces (PESs) and derivative couplings that come from electronic structure calculations. The canonical equations of motion (EOMs) (i.e., Hamilton's equations) that come from the adiabatic MM Hamiltonian, however, in addition to the common first-derivative couplings, also involve second-derivative non-adiabatic coupling terms (as does the quantum Schrödinger equation), and the latter are considerably more difficult to calculate. This paper thus revisits the adiabatic version of the MM Hamiltonian and describes a modification of the classical adiabatic EOMs that are entirely equivalent to Hamilton's equations but that do not involve the second-derivative couplings. The second-derivative coupling terms have not been neglected; they simply do not appear in these modified adiabatic EOMs. This means that SQC/MM calculations can be carried out in the adiabatic representation, without approximation, needing only the PESs and the first-derivative coupling elements. The results of example SQC/MM calculations are presented, which illustrate this point, and also the fact that simply neglecting the second-derivative couplings in Hamilton's equations (and presumably also in the Schrödinger equation) can cause very significant errors.

Negative Zero-Point-Energy Parameter in the Meyer-Miller Mapping Model for Nonadiabatic Dynamics

Quantum Zeno Effect in the Multimode Quantum Rabi Model

Commutator Matrix in Phase Space Mapping Models for Nonadiabatic Quantum Dynamics

A New Perspective for Nonadiabatic Dynamics with Phase Space Mapping Models.

Unified Formulation of Phase Space Mapping Approaches for Nonadiabatic Quantum Dynamics

Perturbative Approach for the Dynamics of the Quantum Zeno Subspaces

Extended Hamiltonian Molecular Dynamics: Semiclassical Trajectories with Improved Maintenance of Zero Point Energy.

A partially linearized spin-mapping approach for nonadiabatic dynamics. I. Derivation of the theory

Detailed balance in mixed quantum-classical mapping approaches

Nonadiabatic Dynamics Via the Symmetrical Quasi-Classical Method in the Presence of Anharmonicity.

Spin-mapping approach for nonadiabatic molecular dynamics

Zero-Point Energy Leakage in Quantum Thermal Bath Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Many-body theories for negative kinetic energy systems

On the adiabatic representation of Meyer-Miller electronic-nuclear dynamics

Negative Temperature in Spin Dynamics Simulations

Restoring Kibble-Zurek Scaling and Defect Freezing in Non-Hermitian Systems under Biorthogonal Framework

Analysis of variants of non-adiabatic ring polymer molecular dynamics for calculating excited state dynamics

Contribution of Negative Energy Sea in the σ-ω Model

Ab initio Spin-Mapping Non-adiabatic Dynamics Simulations of Photochemistry

Which Algorithm Best Propagates the Meyer-Miller-Stock-Thoss Mapping Hamiltonian for Non-Adiabatic Dynamics?

Negative-energy and tachyonic solutions in the Weinberg-Tucker-Hammer equation for spin 1