Abstract:Critical reading is required for information literacy in the 21st century. However, how students read and process conflicting information regarding controversial issues is still not clear. Using eye-tracking technology, this exploratory study aimed to identify visual behavior patterns that characterized critical reading strategies when students processed conflicting information about socio-scientific issues, and to examine relationships among students' visual behavior, reading strategies, and reading task outcomes. Forty-eight undergraduate and graduate students participated and read conflicting texts about food-science issues. The conflicting texts were presented in the traditional Chinese language. Participants' eye movements were tracked during the entire reading process and their self-reported critical reading strategies, recall, and opinions on the issues were collected right after reading. Pearson's correlation analyses, lag sequential analyses, and content analyses were used to analyze the data. Results showed that participants with higher scores on self-reported critical reading strategies tended to pay more attention to reasoning information in conflicting reports and to include more judgments in their responses. Further, two significant visual behavior patterns were identified for critical reading: (1) after a pause for thinking or resting, critical readers' visual attention shifted directly back to reasoning information; and (2) critical readers' visual attention shifted between reasoning and data information. These two visual behavior patterns suggested that data inspection is important for critical reasoning about conflicting information. This study provided evidence for the applicability of eye-tracking technology in assessing critical reading strategies and relationships between eye-tracking data and self-reported critical reading strategies. Findings can contribute to the future design of adaptive learning systems and teaching of critical reading strategies.

Multidisciplinary Reading Patterns of Digital Documents

An Exploratory Study on Academic Reading Contexts, Technology, and Strategies

An Informatics System for Exploringeye Movements in Reading

A Framework for Learning Assessment through Multimodal Analysis of Reading Behaviour and Language Comprehension

Gaze-Based Annotations For Reading Comprehension

Eye Movement Control in Reading Thai and Chinese

What do critical reading strategies look like? Eye-tracking and lag sequential analysis reveal attention to data and reasoning when reading conflicting information

Variabletypography: artificial intelligence augmented reading experience

Reading multiple documents on a health-related issue: the roles of a text-highlighting tool and re-reading behaviour in integrated understanding

Digital Literacy and Reading Habits of The DMI-St. Eugene University Students

Information discernment and online reading behaviour: an experiment

Reading on Paper and Digitally: What the Past Decades of Empirical Research Reveal

Decoding Reading Goals from Eye Movements

Chinese Humanities Scholars' Reading of Academic E‐books: A Survey on Reading Strategies and Tasks

Reading in print versus digital media uses different cognitive strategies: evidence from eye movements during science-text reading

Afraid to ask: proactive assistance with healthcare documents using eye tracking.

Online Survey of Digital Reading by Adults with Low Vision

Quantitative Analysis of Reading Behavior Research Method in Digital Era

Eye Tracking on Text Reading with Visual Enhancements

Task and user effects on reading patterns in information search

The Semantic Reader Project: Augmenting Scholarly Documents through AI-Powered Interactive Reading Interfaces