Enough Hot Air: The Role of Immersion Cooling

Kawsar Haghshenas,Brian Setz,Yannis Bloch,Marco Aiello

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.04257

2022-05-09

Abstract:Air cooling is the traditional solution to chill servers in data centers. However, the continuous increase in global data center energy consumption combined with the increase of the racks' power dissipation calls for the use of more efficient alternatives. Immersion cooling is one such alternative. In this paper, we quantitatively examine and compare air cooling and immersion cooling solutions. The examined characteristics include power usage efficiency (PUE), computing and power density, cost, and maintenance overheads. A direct comparison shows a reduction of about 50% in energy consumption and a reduction of about two-thirds of the occupied space, by using immersion cooling. In addition, the higher heat capacity of used liquids in immersion cooling compared to air allows for much higher rack power densities. Moreover, immersion cooling requires less capital and operational expenditures. However, challenging maintenance procedures together with the increased number of IT failures are the main downsides. By selecting immersion cooling, cloud providers must trade-off the decrease in energy and cost and the increase in power density with its higher maintenance and reliability concerns. Finally, we argue that retrofitting an air-cooled data center with immersion cooling will result in high costs and is generally not recommended.

Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main issue this paper attempts to address is the high energy consumption and low power density problems faced by data centers using traditional air cooling technology. With the continuous growth of global data center energy consumption and the increase in rack power consumption, researchers and cloud service providers are beginning to explore more efficient alternative cooling solutions, particularly liquid immersion cooling technology. Through quantitative analysis and comparison of the performance of air cooling and liquid immersion cooling in terms of energy efficiency, computing and power density, cost, and maintenance, the paper aims to evaluate the feasibility and pros and cons of liquid immersion cooling as a future cooling solution for data centers.

Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:
1. **Energy Consumption**: Liquid immersion cooling can significantly reduce energy consumption compared to air cooling, reducing energy consumption by approximately 50%.
2. **Space Occupation**: Liquid immersion cooling can reduce the occupied space by about two-thirds.
3. **Power Density**: Liquid immersion cooling allows for higher rack power density, up to 250 kW/rack, whereas the maximum power density for air cooling is about 50 kW/rack.
4. **Cost**: Liquid immersion cooling has advantages in both capital expenditure and operating expenditure.
5. **Maintenance**: Although liquid immersion cooling performs well in terms of energy efficiency and cost, its maintenance complexity and higher IT equipment failure rate are major challenges.

The paper also discusses the high cost issue of retrofitting existing air-cooled data centers to liquid immersion cooling and suggests that such retrofitting is generally not recommended. Overall, through comprehensive analysis, the paper provides a reference for data center operators in selecting the optimal cooling solution.