The Right Tool for the Job: Matching Active Learning Techniques to Learning Objectives

Sarah A. Jacobson,Luyao Zhang,Jiasheng Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.03393

2022-07-13

Abstract:Active learning comprises many varied techniques that engage students actively in the construction of their understanding. Because of this variation, different active learning techniques may be best suited to achieving different learning objectives. We study students' perceptions of a set of active learning techniques (including a Python simulation and an interactive game) and some traditional techniques (like lecture). We find that students felt they engaged fairly actively with all of the techniques, though more with those with a heavy grade weight and some of the active learning techniques, and they reported enjoying the active learning techniques the most except for an assignment that required soliciting peer advice on a research idea. All of the techniques were rated as relatively effective for achieving each of six learning objectives, but to varying extents. The most traditional techniques like exams were rated highest for achieving an objective associated with lower order cognitive skills, remembering concepts. In contrast, some active learning techniques like class presentations and the Python simulation were rated highest for achieving objectives related to higher order cognitive skills, including learning to conduct research, though lectures also performed surprisingly well for these objectives. Other technique-objective matches are intuitive; for example, the debate is rated highly for understanding pros and cons of an issue, and small group discussion is rated highly for collaborative learning. Our results support the idea that different teaching techniques are best suited for different outcomes, which implies that a mix of techniques may be optimal in course design.

General Economics,Human-Computer Interaction,Computational Finance,Applications,Computation

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Differences in the effectiveness of different teaching techniques (especially active learning techniques) in achieving different learning objectives**. Specifically, the authors studied students' perceptions of various active learning techniques and traditional teaching methods to evaluate how effectively these techniques support different learning objectives, such as memorizing concepts, understanding different perspectives, analyzing real - world problems, collaborative learning, conducting systematic research, and understanding the pros and cons of macro - economic policies.

### Background and Motivation of the Paper

1. **Importance of Active Learning**
- Active learning has been proven to significantly improve learning outcomes in university courses.
- However, many teachers still use active learning methods rarely or not at all.
- Different active learning techniques may vary in their effectiveness in achieving different learning objectives.

2. **Research Purposes**
- To evaluate students' perceptions of multiple active learning techniques.
- To compare the effectiveness of these techniques and traditional teaching methods in achieving specific learning objectives.
- To explore which techniques are most suitable for achieving which learning objectives, thereby providing guidance for curriculum design.

### Main Findings

1. **Engagement and Satisfaction**
- Students think that all techniques are relatively effective, but each technique performs differently in achieving different objectives.
- For example, quizzes and exams are considered the most effective for students to memorize concepts, while debates and Python simulations are excellent in understanding and applying advanced cognitive skills.

2. **Effectiveness of Different Techniques**
- **Memorizing Concepts**: Traditional techniques such as lectures, problem sets, and quizzes are considered the most effective.
- **Understanding Different Perspectives**: Active learning techniques such as debates and group discussions are considered more effective.
- **Analyzing Real - World Problems**: Research idea presentations are widely considered the most effective because this requires students to apply theory to practical problems.
- **Collaborative Learning**: Group discussions and debates are considered the best choices because these activities require cooperation among students.
- **Conducting Systematic Research**: Active learning techniques such as research idea presentations, peer advice, and games are considered the most helpful in cultivating research abilities.
- **Understanding the Pros and Cons of Macro - economic Policies**: Debates are considered the most effective because they are specifically aimed at this objective.

### Conclusion

This study supports the view that different teaching techniques are most suitable for different learning objectives, so adopting diverse teaching methods in curriculum design may be the optimal choice. By matching appropriate techniques to specific learning objectives, students' learning and development can be promoted more effectively.

### Examples of Formulas (if applicable)

This paper does not involve complex formulas, but if it is necessary to express certain concepts, Markdown format can be used:

- **Mean**: $\bar{x}=\frac{\sum_{i = 1}^{n}x_i}{n}$
- **Standard Deviation**: $s=\sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i = 1}^{n}(x_i-\bar{x})^2}{n - 1}}$

These formulas can help describe data statistical results more precisely.