Different gaze direction (DGNet) collaborative learning for iris segmentation
Bonyani, Mahdi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-024-02232-1
2024-06-07
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics
Abstract:Segmentation of the iris plays a pivotal role in iris recognition systems, yet it remains challenging, particularly in scenarios with noisy images from non-cooperative subjects. While deep learning, exemplified by the U-Net architecture, has shown promise in iris segmentation, it often struggles with capturing structures of varying shapes within the iris. To address this problem, we present a novel collaborative learning framework termed Different Gaze Direction Network (DGNet) for iris segmentation. The proposed methodology leverages both center gaze correspondence modeling (CGCM) and partial correspondence modeling (PCM) to establish inter-image relationships among images captured from different gaze directions. By conceptualizing images as distinct temporal slices, we employ 3D convolution to integrate primary features intuitively, facilitating a holistic understanding of group-level semantics. Moreover, in order to enhance inter-image correspondence, we propose Dyads Correlation Fusion (DCF) technique. Additionally, the paper introduces gaze direction aggregation (GDA) module amalgamates CGCM and PCM inter-image relationships to explore comprehensive collaboration cues. Through the Primary-and-Partial Weighting Fusion module, we dynamically combine primary and partial features to learn semantic representations and predict segmentation maps. DGNet's efficacy is evaluated across four benchmark datasets, demonstrating superior performance compared to state-of-the-art methodologies. Specifically, DGNet achieves F1-scores of 99.37%, 99.22%, 97.35%, and 97.67% on CASIA, UBIRIS.v2, MICHE-I, and SVBPI datasets, respectively. Additionally, DGNet achieves Precision values of 99.41%, 99.31%, 97.68%, and 97.44%, Recall values of 99.34%, 99.12%, 97.04%, and 97.91%, and Mean Intersection over Union (MIOU) values of 98.64%, 98.71%, 95.64%, and 96.12% on the respective datasets.
computer science, artificial intelligence