Abstract:The brain is not only constrained by energy needed to fuel computation, but it is also constrained by energy needed to form memories. Experiments have shown that learning simple conditioning tasks which might require only a few synaptic updates, already carries a significant metabolic cost. Yet, learning a task like MNIST to 95% accuracy appears to require at least 10 8 synaptic updates. Therefore the brain has likely evolved to be able to learn using as little energy as possible. We explored the energy required for learning in feedforward neural networks. Based on a parsimonious energy model, we propose two plasticity restricting algorithms that save energy: 1) only modify synapses with large updates, and 2) restrict plasticity to subsets of synapses that form a path through the network. In biology networks are often much larger than the task requires, yet vanilla backprop prescribes to update all synapses. In particular in this case, large savings can be achieved while only incurring a slightly worse learning time. Thus competitively restricting plasticity helps to save metabolic energy associated to synaptic plasticity. The results might lead to a better understanding of biological plasticity and a better match between artificial and biological learning. Moreover, the algorithms might benefit hardware because also electronic memory storage is energetically costly. There is increasing evidence learning already very simple tasks in animals requires substantial amounts of metabolic energy. This raises the question how much energy it costs to learn more complex tasks. For instance, the well known backpropagation algorithm always updates all synapses in the network and one can wonder if that is necessary. In the theoretical study we estimate the energy needed for an artificial neural network to learn to classify the well-known MNIST data set. We find that in particular in larger networks, substantial energy savings can be achieved, by carefully selecting which synapses to update. This is particular relevant for the neural networks in the brain that often contain millions of neurons. This study will hopefully lead to a better understanding of learning processes in biology. Moreover, as training large artificial neural networks consumes substantial amount of electric energy, the savings algorithms proposed here, might help to reduce those costs as well.

Position-wise optimizer: A nature-inspired optimization algorithm

Effective Neural Network Training with a New Weighting Mechanism-Based Optimization Algorithm.

Optimality of short-term synaptic plasticity in modelling certain dynamic environments

Noise Helps Optimization Escape from Saddle Points in the Synaptic Plasticity

To update or not to update? Neurons at equilibrium in deep models

Natural-gradient learning for spiking neurons

Competitive plasticity to reduce the energetic costs of learning

Noise Helps Optimization Escape from Saddle Points in the Neural Dynamics.

Neural Optimizer Equation, Decay Function, and Learning Rate Schedule Joint Evolution

Oja's plasticity rule overcomes several challenges of training neural networks under biological constraints

Neuron-centric Hebbian Learning

Adaptation of nature inspired optimization algorithms for deep learning

Optimization Over Trained Neural Networks: Taking a Relaxing Walk

Dynamic Optimization of Neural Network Structures Using Probabilistic Modeling

First Steps Towards a Runtime Analysis of Neuroevolution

Hyperparameter Optimization in Binary Communication Networks for Neuromorphic Deployment

Towards New Generation, Biologically Plausible Deep Neural Network Learning

Learning by Turning: Neural Architecture Aware Optimisation

A Generalizable Approach to Learning Optimizers

Evaluation and comparison of methods for neuronal parameter optimization using the Neuroptimus software framework