Abstract:For a log Calabi Yau pair (X,D) with X\D smooth affine, satisfying either assumption 1.1 of "The canonical wall structure and intrinsic mirror symmetry" or contains a Zariski dense torus, we prove under the condition that D is the support of a nef divisor, that the structure constants defining a trace form on the mirror algebra constructed by Gross-Siebert are given by the naive curve counts defined by Keel-Yu in definition 1.1 of "The Frobenius structure theorem for log Calabi-Yau varieties containing a torus". As a corollary, we deduce the equality of the mirror algebras constructed by Gross-Siebert and Keel-Yu in the case X\D contains a Zariski dense torus. In addition, we use this result to prove a mirror conjecture proposed by Mandel in "Fano mirror periods from the Frobenius structure conjecture" for Fano pairs satisfying assumption 1.1.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to compare the consistency of two different mirror - symmetric construction methods when dealing with certain types of logarithmic Calabi - Yau pairs ($X, D$). Specifically, the paper compares the method constructed by Keel and Yu based on non - Archimedean geometry and the method constructed by Gross and Siebert based on logarithmic geometry. Although these two methods have different starting points, the main goal of the paper is to prove that in most cases, when both can be constructed, the results they give are consistent.
### Main problems
1. **Consistency verification**: Prove whether the non - Archimedean mirror construction is consistent with the logarithmic - geometric mirror construction under given conditions.
2. **Calculation of structure constants**: Verify the consistency of the two methods by calculating the structure constants, especially for the products of two and three theta functions.
3. **Weak Frobenius structure theorem**: Prove that the weak Frobenius structure theorem holds for logarithmic Calabi - Yau pairs ($X, D$) that satisfy specific assumptions.
### Specific problems
- **Theorem 1.1**: Prove that under certain conditions, the Keel - Yu mirror construction is equal to the Gross - Siebert mirror construction.
- **Corollary 1.2**: For an affine logarithmic Calabi - Yau $U$ that contains a Zariski - dense torus, the Keel - Yu mirror is equal to the Gross - Siebert mirror.
- **Theorem 1.4**: Prove that for logarithmic Calabi - Yau pairs ($X, D$) that satisfy specific assumptions, the weak Frobenius structure theorem holds.
- **Corollary 1.5**: For Fano pairs ($X, D$) that satisfy specific assumptions, prove the correspondence between quantum periods and classical periods.
### Methods
- **Tropical types and moduli spaces**: Use the theory of moduli spaces in tropical geometry to study the tropical types of logarithmic curves and their corresponding moduli spaces.
- **Virtual integration**: Calculate logarithmic Gromov - Witten invariants through virtual integration. These invariants are used to define the structure constants of the mirror algebra.
- **Trace form**: Use the trace form to verify the consistency of the two mirror constructions, especially by calculating the products of two and three theta functions.
### Conclusions
Through detailed mathematical derivations and verifications, the paper proves that under specific conditions, the non - Archimedean mirror construction is equivalent to the logarithmic - geometric mirror construction. This result not only deepens the understanding of mirror symmetry but also provides an important theoretical basis for further research.