Abstract:In manufacturing, advanced robotic technology has opened up the possibility of integrating highly autonomous mobile robots into human teams. However, with this capability comes the issue of how to maximize both team efficiency and the desire of human team members to work with these robotic counterparts. To address this concern, we conducted a set of experiments studying the effects of shared decision-making authority in human–robot and human-only teams. We found that an autonomous robot can outperform a human worker in the execution of part or all of the process of task allocation (p<0.001\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$p<0.001$$\end{document} for both), and that people preferred to cede their control authority to the robot (p<0.001)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$(p<0.001)$$\end{document}. We also established that people value human teammates more than robotic teammates; however, providing robots authority over team coordination more strongly improved the perceived value of these agents than giving similar authority to another human teammate (p<0.001)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$(p< 0.001)$$\end{document}. In post hoc analysis, we found that people were more likely to assign a disproportionate amount of the work to themselves when working with a robot (p<0.01)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$(p<0.01)$$\end{document} rather than human teammates only. Based upon our findings, we provide design guidance for roboticists and industry practitioners to design robotic assistants for better integration into the human workplace.

The Harmony Index: a Utilitarian Metric for Measuring Effectiveness in Mixed-Skill Teams

Relative Synergy Coefficient: A Novel Way to Detect Variable Interaction in Large Dataset

Metrics for Human-Robot Team Design: A Teamwork Perspective on Evaluation of Human-Robot Teams

Harmony in intelligent hybrid teams: the influence of the intellectual ability of artificial intelligence on human members' reactions

'Entanglement' -- A new dynamic metric to measure team flow

Mixed-Initiative Human-Robot Teaming under Suboptimality with Online Bayesian Adaptation

The Measurement of Synergy

More than Task Performance: Developing New Criteria for Successful Human-AI Teaming Using the Cooperative Card Game Hanabi

Calibrating Agency: Human‐Autonomy Teaming and the Future of Work amid Highly Automated Systems

Decision-making authority, team efficiency and human worker satisfaction in mixed human–robot teams

Common Metrics to Benchmark Human-Machine Teams (HMT): A Review

Synergistic Team Composition

Evaluating Fluency in Human–Robot Collaboration

Synergistic Team Composition ( Extended Abstract )

Quantifying team chemistry in scientific collaboration

Kill Chaos with Kindness: Agreeableness Improves Team Performance Under Uncertainty

On the quantification of human-robot collaboration quality

The Zen of Multidisciplinary Team Recommendation

Encouraging Human Interaction with Robot Teams: Legible and Fair Subtask Allocations

Measuring Team Creativity Through Longitudinal Social Signals

Human Robot Collaboration for Enhancing Work Activities.