Metaverse: Security and Privacy Concerns

Ruoyu Zhao,Yushu Zhang,Youwen Zhu,Rushi Lan,Zhongyun Hua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.57019/jmv.1286526

2023-06-18

Abstract:The term "metaverse", a three-dimensional virtual universe similar to the real realm, has always been full of imagination since it was put forward in the 1990s. Recently, it is possible to realize the metaverse with the continuous emergence and progress of various technologies, and thus it has attracted extensive attention again. It may bring a lot of benefits to human society such as reducing discrimination, eliminating individual differences, and socializing. However, everything has security and privacy concerns, which is no exception for the metaverse. In this article, we firstly analyze the concept of the metaverse and propose that it is a super virtual-reality (VR) ecosystem compared with other VR technologies. Then, we carefully analyze and elaborate on possible security and privacy concerns from four perspectives: user information, communication, scenario, and goods, and immediately, the potential solutions are correspondingly put forward. Meanwhile, we propose the need to take advantage of the new buckets effect to comprehensively address security and privacy concerns from a philosophical perspective, which hopefully will bring some progress to the metaverse community.

Computers and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems Addressed by the Paper

This paper primarily focuses on the security and privacy issues in the Metaverse. Specifically, the paper attempts to address the following aspects:

1. **User Information**:
- The Metaverse collects a large amount of user information through multi-sensor fusion, including physiological, physical, biometric, and social data. If this sensitive information is leaked, it will seriously threaten the user's privacy and security.
- It is necessary to protect user information from being accessed by illegal third parties.

2. **Communication**:
- The Metaverse is highly interactive and social, so communication occurs frequently. The content of communication is often very private and sensitive, and users want only legitimate recipients to understand and recover the communication content.
- It is necessary to protect communication content from being understood and recovered by non-communicators.

3. **Scenarios**:
- As a virtual reality world, the Metaverse may encounter conflicts similar to those in the real world, such as religious, political, gender, and sexual orientation conflicts.
- Malicious users may engage in harassment, stalking, and other behaviors in the Metaverse, which will reduce user experience and cause discomfort.
- It is necessary to prevent malicious behavior and allow users to set personalized scenarios to block unwanted content.

4. **Goods**:
- Users in the Metaverse can create various goods, such as character modeling, appearances, clothing, buildings, and artworks. These goods have both spiritual and economic value, and users do not want their value to be illegally damaged.
- Goods transactions may be disrupted by malicious users, and users want to anonymize their rights in transactions.
- It is necessary to protect the goods themselves and the security of their transactions.

### Solutions

The paper proposes the following solutions:

1. **User Information**:
- Protect individual precise signal information, such as heartbeat information, through signal shielding and transmission prohibition.
- Classify and protect visual multimedia content, including generalized protection, whitelist protection, and blacklist protection.

2. **Communication**:
- Use encryption technology to ensure that only legitimate recipients can decrypt the communication content.
- Introduce encryption methods that retain thumbnails to balance privacy security and visual observability.

3. **Scenarios**:
- Provide setting windows that allow users to prevent certain scenarios from appearing in their view.
- Use voice and text detection models to identify and block offensive content.
- Combine multiple factors (such as body posture, facial expressions, gestures, objects, and social relationships) to detect malicious behavior.
- Use methods such as invisibility and teleportation to avoid harassment and stalking.

4. **Goods**:
- Use invisible watermarking technology to embed specific marks related to identity in goods to achieve content protection, authentication, and anti-tampering functions.
- Use blockchain technology to solve the issues of ownership, traceability, and transfer of goods, ensuring the security and anonymity of transactions.

### Comprehensive Consideration

The paper also proposes a new bucket effect theory, emphasizing that when dealing with security and privacy issues in the Metaverse, multiple aspects need to be considered comprehensively rather than solving problems in isolation. By designing systematic and coherent solutions, security and privacy issues in the Metaverse can be more effectively mitigated.