Abstract:Doing quantum ethics properly will require detailed socio-political analysis of the technologies and the organizations trying to build them. In this paper, I contribute to this task by analysing the public rhetoric of American military stakeholders in the quantum industry. I look at Air Force Research Laboratory involvement in the 2020 Quantum 2 Business conference, where they were the main sponsor. A critical thematic analysis shows a focus on enacting the violence of war, maintaining narratives that the Air Force provides a secure future for Americans, and marrying quantum technology with the aesthetics of war. I contextualize this with anti-imperialist theory, arguing that this rhetoric and the desire for quantum arms aligns with the reproduction of existing violent power structures. Insights about this example of military involvement in quantum spaces should help orient nascent critical quantum ethics interventions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is the ethical issues in quantum science and technology, especially how military forces use Quantum Science and Technology (QST) for war preparation and implementation, and whether such use should be supported. By analyzing the public statements of the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) at the 2020 Quantum Technology and Business Conference (Quantum 2 Business, Q2B), the author explores the participation of military institutions in the field of quantum science and technology and the sociopolitical motives behind it. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:
1. **Quantum Science and Technology in Military Rhetoric**: The author analyzes the statements of AFRL at the Q2B conference, revealing how they combine quantum science and technology with the aesthetics of war, emphasizing the role of technology in supporting war, such as achieving GPS - free navigation through quantum sensors, quantum clocks and other technologies, and detecting submarines without radar, aiming to maintain the technological advantage of the US Air Force, thereby "keeping the fight unfair".
2. **Technical Strategic Language**: The statements of AFRL use a large amount of technical strategic language, which tends to focus the discussion on the technology itself and its applications, while ignoring the human suffering and death that the technology may cause. For example, AFRL often uses the passive voice to describe technical functions, such as "quantum sensors... will allow [certain functions]", this expression positions AFRL as an intermediary of technological achievements, rather than the direct responsible party for technological consequences.
3. **Revolution and Transformation**: Representatives of AFRL frequently mention terms such as "transformational technology", "disruptive innovation" and "game - changing progress", emphasizing the "life - changing" potential of quantum information science. However, this "revolutionary" narrative is often associated with the framework of military competition and imminent threats, implying that the technological development of AFRL is to meet some urgent national security challenges.
4. **Aesthetics of War**: AFRL uses a large number of visual elements related to war in its speeches and promotional materials, such as fast shots of tanks, stealth aircraft and aircraft carriers, and images of missiles hitting targets. These images directly link specific quantum technologies to acts of war, further beautifying and normalizing war.
Through the above analysis, the author raises a crucial question: as quantum scientists, engineers and policy - makers, do we want quantum science and technology to be used to support the imperialist wars of the United States? If the answer is no, then we need to pay attention to the current development path of quantum science and technology and take action to oppose the use of quantum science and technology to maintain the existing destructive power structures.