Abstract: Propensity score methods have been shown to be powerful in obtaining efficient estimators of average treatment effect (ATE) from observational data, especially under the existence of confounding factors. When estimating, deciding which type of covariates need to be included in the propensity score function is important, since incorporating some unnecessary covariates may amplify both bias and variance of estimators of ATE. In this paper, we show that including additional instrumental variables that satisfy the exclusion restriction for outcome will do harm to the statistical efficiency. Also, we prove that, controlling for covariates that appear as outcome predictors, i.e. predict the outcomes and are irrelevant to the exposures, can help reduce the asymptotic variance of ATE estimation. We also note that, efficiently estimating the ATE by non-parametric or semi-parametric methods require the estimated propensity score function, as described in Hirano et al. (2003)\cite{Hirano2003}. Such estimation procedure usually asks for many regularity conditions, Rothe (2016)\cite{Rothe2016} also illustrated this point and proposed a known propensity score (KPS) estimator that requires mild regularity conditions and is still fully efficient. In addition, we introduce a linearly modified (LM) estimator that is nearly efficient in most general settings and need not estimation of the propensity score function, hence convenient to calculate. The construction of this estimator borrows idea from the interaction estimator of Lin (2013)\cite{Lin2013}, in which regression adjustment with interaction terms are applied to deal with data arising from a completely randomized experiment. As its name suggests, the LM estimator can be viewed as a linear modification on the IPW estimator using known propensity scores. We will also investigate its statistical properties both analytically and numerically.

Minimax rates for heterogeneous causal effect estimation

Minimax optimal subgroup identification

Estimating individual treatment effect: generalization bounds and algorithms

CATE Lasso: Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimation with High-Dimensional Linear Regression

A Unified Framework for Efficient Estimation of General Treatment Models

Interval Estimation of Individual-Level Causal Effects under Unobserved Confounding

Program Evaluation and Causal Inference with High-Dimensional Data

A nonparametric super-efficient estimator of the average treatment effect

Efficient combination of observational and experimental datasets under general restrictions on outcome mean functions

Nonparametric estimation of conditional incremental effects

Optimal rates of convergence for estimating the null density and proportion of nonnull effects in large-scale multiple testing

A UNIFIED STUDY OF NONPARAMETRIC INFERENCE FOR MONOTONE FUNCTIONS

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects Via a High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects via High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

Triple/Debiased Lasso for Statistical Inference of Conditional Average Treatment Effects

Two-Way Exclusion Restrictions in Models with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Do Contemporary CATE Models Capture Real-World Heterogeneity? Findings from a Large-Scale Benchmark

A robust and efficient approach to causal inference based on sparse sufficient dimension reduction

Accounting for Missing Covariates in Heterogeneous Treatment Estimation

Causal Inference under Unmeasured Confounding with Negative Controls: A Minimax Learning Approach.

Variance Reduction for Causal Inference