Abstract:We study adversarial perturbations when the instances are uniformly distributed over $\{0,1\}^n$. We study both "inherent" bounds that apply to any problem and any classifier for such a problem as well as bounds that apply to specific problems and specific hypothesis classes. As the current literature contains multiple definitions of adversarial risk and robustness, we start by giving a taxonomy for these definitions based on their goals, we identify one of them as the one guaranteeing misclassification by pushing the instances to the error region. We then study some classic algorithms for learning monotone conjunctions and compare their adversarial risk and robustness under different definitions by attacking the hypotheses using instances drawn from the uniform distribution. We observe that sometimes these definitions lead to significantly different bounds. Thus, this study advocates for the use of the error-region definition, even though other definitions, in other contexts, may coincide with the error-region definition. Using the error-region definition of adversarial perturbations, we then study inherent bounds on risk and robustness of any classifier for any classification problem whose instances are uniformly distributed over $\{0,1\}^n$. Using the isoperimetric inequality for the Boolean hypercube, we show that for initial error $0.01$, there always exists an adversarial perturbation that changes $O(\sqrt{n})$ bits of the instances to increase the risk to $0.5$, making classifier's decisions meaningless. Furthermore, by also using the central limit theorem we show that when $n\to \infty$, at most $c \cdot \sqrt{n}$ bits of perturbations, for a universal constant $c< 1.17$, suffice for increasing the risk to $0.5$, and the same $c \cdot \sqrt{n} $ bits of perturbations on average suffice to increase the risk to $1$, hence bounding the robustness by $c \cdot \sqrt{n}$.

Boosting Barely Robust Learners: A New Perspective on Adversarial Robustness

Robust optimization for adversarial learning with finite sample complexity guarantees

Oracle-Based Robust Optimization via Online Learning

A Dual Perspective of Sparse and Robust Online Learning Algorithm

A more robust boosting algorithm

Adversarially Robust Learning with Unknown Perturbation Sets

Enhancing Adversarial Robustness in Low-Label Regime via Adaptively Weighted Regularization and Knowledge Distillation

Robust boosting for regression problems

Regularization for Adversarial Robust Learning

Adversarial Risk and Robustness: General Definitions and Implications for the Uniform Distribution

Distributionally Robust Learning With Stable Adversarial Training

LEARN: An Invex Loss for Outlier Oblivious Robust Online Optimization

Improving Machine Learning Robustness via Adversarial Training

Robust Optimization for Non-Convex Objectives

Boosting in the presence of outliers: adaptive classification with non-convex loss functions

Local Competition and Uncertainty for Adversarial Robustness in Deep Learning

Optimization and Optimizers for Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness under Long-Tailed Distribution

SPLBoost: An Improved Robust Boosting Algorithm Based on Self-Paced Learning

Understanding Robustness in Teacher-Student Setting: A New Perspective

Fast Provably Robust Decision Trees and Boosting