Cashing Out: Assessing the risk of localised financial exclusion as the UK moves towards a cashless society

George Sullivan,Luke Burns

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.05674

2022-01-07

Abstract:Whilst academic, commercial and policy literature on financial exclusion is extensive and wide-ranging, there have been very few attempts to quantify and measure localised financial exclusion anywhere in the world. This is a subject of growing importance in modern UK society with the withdrawal of cash infrastructure and a shift towards online banking. This research develops a composite indicator using a wide-range of input variables, including the locations of existing cash infrastructure, various demographic factors (such as income and housing tenure) and other freely available lifestyle data to identify areas at greatest risk of financial exclusion, thereby aiding organisations to develop intervention strategies to tackle the problem. The indicator illustrates that whilst there is no apparent correlation between financial exclusion and deprivation, pockets of extreme financial exclusion are generally found in deprived communities, and affluent, suburban areas tend to score consistently more favourably and consequently carry less risk. The attributing causes vary, from a lack of infrastructure, to low car availability, but income levels have a pronounced influence. Three policy proposals are put forward, including offering banking services at PayPoint outlets, and converting cash machines to cash recyclers, but improving digital adoption was found to be the most effective intervention, provided that it is implemented by community organisations. Policies purely targeting infrastructure provision or addressing social exclusion are unlikely to be effective, as community-based initiatives coupled with wider reforms to the financial system are needed.

General Finance

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to quantify and measure the localized financial exclusion risks faced by specific communities during the transition of the UK to a cash - less society. Specifically, the research aims to:

1. **Identify high - risk areas**: By developing a composite indicator, combining the location of existing cash infrastructure, demographic factors (such as income and housing conditions), and other available lifestyle data, to determine the areas most likely to suffer from financial exclusion.

2. **Understand the reasons**: Analyze why some areas are more vulnerable to financial exclusion than others. The research shows that although there is no obvious correlation between financial exclusion and poverty, extreme financial exclusion often exists in poor areas. Affluent suburbs usually score higher and face lower risks. Reasons for this phenomenon include lack of infrastructure, low car ownership rate, etc., but income level is a significant influencing factor.

3. **Propose intervention strategies**: Based on the above analysis results, three policy recommendations are proposed:
- Provide banking services at PayPoint outlets;
- Convert ATMs into cash recyclers;
- Promote the application of digital technology, especially through community organizations.

The research points out that policies relying solely on increasing infrastructure or solving social exclusion problems may not be effective and need to combine community initiatives and broader financial system reforms.

### Formula representation

When describing the composite indicator, the following formula can be used to represent the weight of each factor and the scoring mechanism:

\[ \text{Total score} = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} w_i\times s_i \]

where:
- \( w_i \) is the weight of the \( i \) - th factor;
- \( s_i \) is the score of the \( i \) - th factor;
- \( n \) is the total number of factors considered.

For example, the financial exclusion score for a particular area can be expressed as:

\[ \text{Score} = w_1\times \text{Cash access ability}+ w_2\times \text{Demand distribution}+ w_3\times \text{Availability of alternatives} \]

These formulas help ensure the transparency and repeatability of the research method.