Abstract:Average causal effects are averages of (heterogeneous) individual treatment effects (ITEs) taken over the entire target population. The estimation of average causal effects has been studied in depth, but averages are insufficient for more individualised decision-making where ITEs are more appropriate. However, estimating ITEs for every population member is challenging, particularly when estimation must be based on observational data rather than data from randomised experiments. One potential problem with observational data arises when there are large differences between the sample distributions of the input features of the treated and control units. This problem is known as covariate shift. It can lead to model misspecification the harmful effects of which can be severe for ITE estimation because point estimation is highly sensitive to regions of the common support of the input space in which the number of treated or control units is very small. Moreover, common solutions are often based on reweighing schemes involving propensity scores which were originally designed for average effects and not ITEs. In this paper, we propose Debiasing Generative Trees, a novel data augmentation method based on generative trees that debiases and undersmooths causal estimators trained on augmented data. It encourages higher modelling complexity that reduces misspecification and improves estimation of ITEs. We show empirically that our proposed approach yields models of higher complexity and more accurate predictions of ITEs, and is competitive with traditional methods for estimating average treatment effects. Our results confirm that reweighing methods can struggle with ITE estimation and that the choice of model class can significantly impact prediction performance.

Generalized Causal Tree for Uplift Modeling

Causal Inference Based Single-branch Ensemble Trees For Uplift Modeling

Uplift Modeling with Multiple Treatments and General Response Types

Causal Enhanced Uplift Model

UTBoost: Gradient Boosted Decision Trees for Uplift Modeling

A Practically Competitive and Provably Consistent Algorithm for Uplift Modeling

A Twin Neural Model for Uplift

Uplift Modeling based on Graph Neural Network Combined with Causal Knowledge

GCF: Generalized Causal Forest for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation in Online Marketplace

Feature Selection Methods for Uplift Modeling and Heterogeneous Treatment Effect

Uplift Modeling for Multiple Treatments with Cost Optimization

Uplift Modeling: from Causal Inference to Personalization

Uplift Modeling Under Limited Supervision

Undersmoothing Causal Estimators With Generative Trees

Interpretable Multiple Treatment Revenue Uplift Modeling

Adapting Neural Networks for Uplift Models

Pessimistic Uplift Modeling

Learning Discriminative Representation Base on Attention for Uplift

A Policy Gradient Method with Variance Reduction for Uplift Modeling.

KDSM: An uplift modeling framework based on knowledge distillation and sample matching

Uplift modeling with quasi-loss-functions