Abstract:Existing research on learning with noisy labels mainly focuses on synthetic label noise. Synthetic noise, though has clean structures which greatly enabled statistical analyses, often fails to model real-world noise patterns. The recent literature has observed several efforts to offer real-world noisy datasets, yet the existing efforts suffer from two caveats: (1) The lack of ground-truth verification makes it hard to theoretically study the property and treatment of real-world label noise; (2) These efforts are often of large scales, which may result in unfair comparisons of robust methods within reasonable and accessible computation power. To better understand real-world label noise, it is crucial to build controllable and moderate-sized real-world noisy datasets with both ground-truth and noisy labels. This work presents two new benchmark datasets CIFAR-10N, CIFAR-100N, equipping the training datasets of CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 with human-annotated real-world noisy labels we collected from Amazon Mechanical Turk. We quantitatively and qualitatively show that real-world noisy labels follow an instance-dependent pattern rather than the classically assumed and adopted ones (e.g., class-dependent label noise). We then initiate an effort to benchmarking a subset of the existing solutions using CIFAR-10N and CIFAR-100N. We further proceed to study the memorization of correct and wrong predictions, which further illustrates the difference between human noise and class-dependent synthetic noise. We show indeed the real-world noise patterns impose new and outstanding challenges as compared to synthetic label noise. These observations require us to rethink the treatment of noisy labels, and we hope the availability of these two datasets would facilitate the development and evaluation of future learning with noisy label solutions. Datasets and leaderboards are available at <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://noisylabels.com" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>.

Learning with Neighbor Consistency for Noisy Labels

FGCM: Noisy Label Learning via Fine-Grained Confidence Modeling

Neighborhood Collective Estimation for Noisy Label Identification and Correction

Noisy Label Learning Based on Weighted Neighborhood Consistency

Learning with Noisy Labels Via Self-supervised Adversarial Noisy Masking

Consensus Co-teaching for Dynamically Learning with Noisy Labels

LABELNET: Recovering Noisy Labels

Learning Multi-Level Consistency for Noisy Labels

Countering Noisy Labels by Learning from Auxiliary Clean Labels

Label Correction Using Contrastive Prototypical Classifier for Noisy Label Learning.

Learning from Noisy Labels with Noise Modeling Network

Noisy Label Learning with Provable Consistency for a Wider Family of Losses.

Feature-Induced Label Distribution for Learning with Noisy Labels

Attention-Aware Noisy Label Learning for Image Classification

Learning with Noisy Labels: Interconnection of Two Expectation-Maximizations

Consistency Regularization on Clean Samples for Learning with Noisy Labels

Learning from Open-Set Noisy Labels Based on Multi-Prototype Modeling

Confidence Adaptive Regularization for Deep Learning with Noisy Labels

Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotations

Combating Noisy Labels by Agreement: A Joint Training Method with Co-Regularization

Asymmetric Co-teaching with Multi-view Consensus for Noisy Label Learning