Relating cognition to both brain structure and function: A systematic review of methods

Marta Czime Litwińczuk,Nelson Trujillo-Barreto,Nils Muhlert,Lauren Cloutman,Anna Woollams
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.02090
2022-02-04
Abstract:Cognitive neuroscience explores the mechanisms of cognition by studying its structural and functional brain correlates. Here, we report the first systematic review that assesses how information from structural and functional neuroimaging methods can be integrated to investigate the brain substrates of cognition. Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched for studies of healthy young adult populations that collected cognitive data, and structural and functional neuroimaging data. Five percent of screened studies met all inclusion criteria. Next, 54% of included studies related cognitive performance to brain structure and function without quantitative analysis of the relationship. Finally, 32% of studies formally integrated structural and functional brain data. Overall, many studies consider either structural or functional neural correlates of cognition, and of those that consider both, they have rarely been integrated. We identified four emergent approaches to the characterisation of the relationship between brain structure, function and cognition; comparative, predictive, fusion and complementary. We discuss the insights provided each approach and how authors can select approaches to suit their research questions.
Neurons and Cognition
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to integrate structural and functional neuroimaging data to study cognitive functions and their neural bases. Specifically, this systematic review aims to evaluate existing research methods and understand how structural and functional neuroimaging data are combined to interpret cognitive functions in healthy adult populations. ### Main problems of the paper 1. **Integrating structural and functional neuroimaging data**: Currently, many studies either focus only on brain structure (such as gray matter volume, white matter integrity) or only on brain function (such as activation patterns or functional connectivity in functional magnetic resonance imaging, fMRI). However, few studies consider both aspects simultaneously and attempt to integrate them. 2. **Quantitative analysis of the relationship between structure and function**: Even though some studies have collected structural and functional data simultaneously, most of them have not conducted quantitative analysis to explore the relationship between the two. Therefore, the understanding of how structure and function jointly act on cognitive functions remains limited. 3. **Diversity and selection of methodologies**: Different studies have adopted a variety of methods to integrate structural and functional data, including comparison methods, prediction models, fusion methods, and complementary methods. These methods each have their own advantages and disadvantages and are suitable for different types of research questions. ### Specific objectives - **Evaluating existing literature**: Through a systematic literature review, determine how many studies have used both structural and functional neuroimaging data simultaneously and have conducted quantitative analysis on these data. - **Classifying research methods**: Classify the studies into three categories: indirect inference, semi - direct inference, and direct inference, according to how researchers infer the relationship between structure and function. - **Proposing future directions**: Based on the limitations of existing research, it is recommended that future research should more often use quantitative methods to integrate structural and functional data in order to better understand the neural bases of cognitive functions. ### Research background Cognitive neuroscience explores cognitive mechanisms by studying the associations between brain structure and function. Early studies usually evaluated the impact of brain structure or function on cognitive task performance separately. In recent years, more and more studies have begun to attempt to integrate data from these two modalities to obtain a more comprehensive understanding. However, this integration is still in its initial stage, and the methods are diverse and lack unified standards. ### Conclusion This paper emphasizes the importance of integrating structural and functional neuroimaging data and points out the deficiencies in current research. In order to better understand the neural bases of cognitive functions, future research needs to more often use quantitative analysis methods, especially those that can consider structural and functional data simultaneously. This will help to reveal the complex relationships between structure and function and provide new perspectives for cognitive neuroscience research.