Abstract:There are growing concerns that algorithms, which increasingly make or influence important decisions pertaining to individuals, might produce outcomes that discriminate against protected groups. We study such fairness concerns in the context of a two-sided market, where there are two sets of agents, and each agent has preferences over the other set. The goal is producing a matching between the sets. This setting has been the focus of a rich body of work. The seminal work of Gale and Shapley formulated a stability desideratum, and showed that a stable matching always exists and can be found efficiently. We study this question through the lens of metric-based fairness notions (Dwork et al., Kim et al.). We formulate appropriate definitions of fairness and stability in the presence of a similarity metric, and ask: does a fair and stable matching always exist? Can such a matching be found in polynomial time? Our contributions are as follows: (1) Composition failures for classical algorithms: We show that composing the Gale-Shapley algorithm with fair hospital preferences can produce blatantly unfair outcomes. (2) New algorithms for finding fair and stable matchings: Our main technical contributions are efficient new algorithms for finding fair and stable matchings when: (i) the hospitals' preferences are fair, and (ii) the fairness metric satisfies a strong "proto-metric" condition: the distance between every two doctors is either zero or one. In particular, these algorithms also show that, in this setting, fairness and stability are compatible. (3) Barriers for finding fair and stable matchings in the general case: We show that if the hospital preferences can be unfair, or if the metric fails to satisfy the proto-metric condition, then no algorithm in a natural class can find a fair and stable matching. The natural class includes the classical Gale-Shapley algorithms and our new algorithms.

Fair Stable Matching Meets Correlated Preferences

Fast, Fair and Truthful Distributed Stable Matching for Common Preferences

On Fairness and Stability in Two-Sided Matchings

Stable matchings with correlated Preferences

Two-Sided Random Matching Markets: Ex-Ante Equivalence of the Deferred Acceptance Procedures

Stable Matching Games

Stable matching as transportation

Reciprocating Preferences Stablize Matching: College Admissions Revisited

Stable Matching with Uncertain Linear Preferences

The Dichotomous Affiliate Stable Matching Problem: Approval-Based Matching with Applicant-Employer Relations

Stable Two-Sided Matching Decision Making with Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations: A Disappointment Theory Based Approach.

Resolute and symmetric mechanisms for two-sided matching problems

Fractional Matchings under Preferences: Stability and Optimality

Almost Envy-free Repeated Matching in Two-sided Markets

Learning Optimal Stable Matches in Decentralized Markets with Unknown Preferences

Matching with Trade-offs: Revealed Preferences over Competing Characteristics

Matchings under Preferences: Strength of Stability and Trade-offs

Matching with Incomplete Preferences

Stable Matchings in Metric Spaces: Modeling Real-World Preferences using Proximity

On (Coalitional) Exchange-Stable Matching

Matching Algorithms: Fundamentals, Applications and Challenges