Abstract:Three strictly comparable cross-section household dataset,related to 1988,1995 and 2001,are used to analyze the rapid yet unequal growth of wage and the sharp widening of wage structure.Earnings functions are compared and the increase in both the level and the inequality of wages are decomposed into their constituent elements.Distinctions are made between the variables likely to represent human capital,discrimination,and segmentation.The evidence suggests that productive characteristics were increasingly rewarded as marketization The Gini coefficient of earnings rose by 10.7 percentage points in the first phase from 1988 to 1995.Whereas the mean wage increased by 67 percent,the pay of the 10th percentile rose by only 22 percent,and that of the 90th percentile rose by 97 percent.These changes are much larger than those of the second phase from 1995 to 2001.Moreover,the returns to education rose sharply,as did the returns to occupation-specific skills.The initially slight inverse-U shape of the age-earnings profile became more pronounced: a change consistent with human capital theory.Thus the productive characteristics of workers were increasingly rewarded in the labor market.However,there were also signs of greater wage discrimination against women.Moreover,the market forces operating in the growing private sector and the relative immunity of the state sector from those forces generated greater wage segmentation among types of ownership,and provincial differences in the pace of reform and in economic growth created spatial segmentation in wages that could not be removed by the equilibrating movement of labor.Decomposition analyses were conducted in order to examine the contribution of particular characteristics to the rise in the Gini coefficient.Only a third of earnings inequality and its increase could be explained: the unobserved determinants are clearly important to the increase in earnings dispersion.The discrimination variables accounted for only a small part of the increase.The segmentation variables made the most important contribution,and that was mainly due to growing wage dispersion among provinces.This result is supported by other evidence of powerful divergence in mean earnings among provinces(Knight,Li and Zhao,2001).Some but not all components of human capital were disequalizing.These particular changes are likely to represent the stirring of labor market forces.

Income Inequality, Cause and Cure

Uneven Growth: Automation’s Impact on Income and Wealth Inequality

Emergence of income inequality: Origin, distribution and possible policies

Marketization and Unequal Growth of Wage: Their Extent and Influence Factors

Displacement Risk: the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Occupational Earnings

The Rise of the Machines: Automation, Horizontal Innovation, and Income Inequality

The Impact of Technological Innovation on Income Inequality

The Impact of Automation on Income Inequality: A Cross-Country Analysis

Rising Income Inequalities – the Causes of and Consequences for Long-term Growth

Foreign direct investment, sectoral distribution and income inequality in developed and developing economies

Information, Impact, Ignorance, Illegality, Investing, and Inequality

Investment-specific technological change, skill accumulation, and wage inequality

Income inequality, managers’ compensation and the falling rate of profit: Reconciling the US evidence

FDI inflows and income inequality: A Schumpeterian economic growth

The impact of digital economy on income inequality from the perspective of technological progress-biased transformation: evidence from China

Exponential Structure of Income Inequality: Evidence from 67 Countries

Executive Compensation, Fat Cats, and Best Athletes

The Dynamics of Disparity: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Causes and Consequences of Income and Wealth Inequality and Policy Interventions for Mitigation

The Digital Divide and Increasing Returns: Contradictions of Informational Capitalism

Wage Risk, Employment Risk, And The Rise In Wage Inequality

Does the digital economy promote or inhibit income inequality?