Abstract:Raymond Smullyan came up with a puzzle that George Boolos called "The Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever".[1] The puzzle has truthful, lying, and random gods who answer yes or no questions with words that we don't know the meaning of. The challenge is to figure out which type each god is. The puzzle has attracted some general attention -- for example, one popular presentation of the puzzle has been viewed 10 million times.[2] Various "top-down" solutions to the puzzle have been developed.[1,3] Here a systematic bottom-up approach to the puzzle and its generalization is presented. We prove that an n gods puzzle is solvable if and only if the random gods are less than the non-random gods, for arbitrary cardinals. We develop a solution using 4.15 questions to the 5 gods variant with 2 random and 3 lying gods.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is "The Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever" and its generalized versions. Specifically, this puzzle was proposed by Raymond Smullyan and was called "The Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever" by George Boolos. The core content of the puzzle is as follows:
- **Puzzle Background**: There are three gods (γ1, γ2, γ3), and they answer "yes" or "no" questions respectively. Each god answers questions with a word whose meaning we don't know (such as 'χ' or '_').
- One of the gods (T) always tells the truth.
- Another god (F) always lies.
- The third god (R) answers randomly.
- **Challenge**: By asking at most three "yes/no" questions, determine the identity of each god (i.e., which god is T, F, and R).
In addition, the paper also explores the more general situation, that is, the puzzle of m random gods and k honest gods among n gods, and proves the conditions for the solvability of the puzzle in this case.
### Main Contributions of the Paper
1. **Systematic Method**: The paper provides a method of gradually building solutions from the bottom up, rather than the common "top - down" method.
2. **Solvability Conditions**: It is proved that a necessary and sufficient condition for an n - god puzzle to be solvable is that the number of random gods is strictly less than the number of non - random gods.
3. **Specific Solution**: A specific solution is given, using 4.15 questions to solve the 5 - god variant (where there are 2 random gods and 3 honest gods).
### Key Formulas and Definitions
- **Definition 2.1**: Given a question \(q\) and a god \(\gamma\), define the function \(t(q,\gamma):=\gamma(" \gamma(q)=\chi ") = \chi\), which is used to judge the truth value of \(q\) when \(\gamma\) is not a random god.
- **Theorem 2.2**: If \(\gamma\neq R\), then \(t(q,\gamma)\leftrightarrow q\).
- **Definition 2.6**: For the 5 - god variant, define \(q_1\) as follows:
\[
q_1:=\bigvee\left\{
\begin{array}{l}
(\gamma_1 = R\land\gamma_2 = T\land\gamma_3 = F),\\
(\gamma_1 = R\land\gamma_2 = F\land\gamma_3 = T),\\
(\gamma_1 = T\land\gamma_2 = F\land\gamma_3 = R),\\
(\gamma_1 = F\land\gamma_2 = T\land\gamma_3 = R)
\end{array}
\right.
\]
Through these definitions and theorems, the paper provides a systematic method to solve this complex logic puzzle and generalizes it to a broader scenario.