Abstract:The precision with which hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) is obtained determines how accurately important observables, such as the muon anomalous magnetic moment aμ or the low-energy running of the electromagnetic coupling α , are predicted. The two most precise approaches for determining HVP are dispersive relations combined with e+e−→hadrons cross section data and lattice QCD. However, the results obtained in these two approaches display significant tensions, whose origins are not understood. Here we present a framework that sheds light on this issue and—if the two approaches can be reconciled—allows them to be combined. Via this framework, we test the hypothesis that the tensions can be explained by modifying the R-ratio in different intervals of center-of-mass energy s . As ingredients, we consider observables that have been precisely determined in both approaches. These are the leading hadronic contributions to aμ , to the so-called intermediate window observable, and to the running of α between spacelike virtualities 1 and 10 GeV2 (for which only a preliminary lattice result exists). Our tests take into account all uncertainties and correlations, as well as uncertainties on uncertainties in the lattice results. For instance, using this framework we show that results obtained in the two approaches can be made to agree, for all three observables, by modifying the ρ peak in the experimental spectrum. More specifically, we show that this requires a common ∼5% increase in the contributions of the peak to each of the three observables. This result is robust against the presence or absence of the running of α in the comparison. However, such an increase is much larger than the uncertainties on the measured R-ratio. We also discuss a variety of generalizations of the methods used here, as well as the limits in the information that can be extracted from the R-ratio via a finite set of observables. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.076019 Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP 3 . Published by the American Physical Society

Super-critical QED-effects via VP-energy

Spontaneous emission in the supercritical QED: what is wrong and what is possible

Magnetic vacuum polarization effects in the supercritical QED: spontaneous generation of a stable highly magnetized phase of the vacuum state

QED Corrections in Unstable Vacuum

Relativistic and Recoil Corrections to Vacuum polarization in muonic systems: Three--photon exchange, gauge invariance and numerical values

Fermionic signal of vacuum polarization in strong laser fields

QED effects in heavy few-electron ions

Radioactive beams and inverse kinematics: Probing the quantal texture of the nuclear vacuum

QED calculations of the nuclear recoil effect in muonic atoms

QED-vacuum response and Cherenkov radiated energy in non-linear and Lorentz-symmetry violating scenarios

Quantum electrodynamic corrections for molecules: Vacuum polarisation and electron self energy in a two-component relativistic framework

Long-range parity non-conserving electron-nucleon interaction

Test of the vector portal with dark fermions in the charge-exchange reactions in the NA64 experiment at CERN SPS

Hadronic vacuum polarization: Comparing lattice QCD and data-driven results in systematically improvable ways

Investigating the sources of low-energy events in a SuperCDMS-HVeV detector

EeV neutrinos associated with UHECR sources

Qed Test At Lep200 Energies In The Reaction E(+)E(-) -> Gamma Gamma(Gamma)

Vacuum Polarization Contribution to Hydrogen and Positronium Energies

Note on Rare Z-boson Decays to Double Heavy Quarkonia