Precise measurement of angles between two magnetic moments and their configurational stability in single-molecule magnets

Rasmus Westerström,Vasilii Dubrovin,Katrin Junghans,Aram Kostanyan,Christin Schlesier,Jan Dreiser,Bernd Büchner,Stanislav M. Avdoshenko,Alexey A. Popov,Thomas Greber
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.224401
2022-01-13
Abstract:A key parameter for the low-temperature magnetic coupling of in dinuclear lanthanide single-molecule magnets (SMMs) is the barrier $U_{FA}$ resulting from the exchange and dipole interactions between the two $4f$ moments. Here we extend the pseudospin model previously used to describe the ground state of dinuclear endofullerenes to account for variations in the orientation of the single-ion anisotropy axes and apply it to the two SMMs Dy$_2$ScN@C$_{80}$ and Dy$_2$TiC@C$_{80}$. While x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) indicates the same $J_z=15/2$ Dy groundstate in both molecules, the Dy-Dy coupling strength and the stability of magnetization is distinct. We demonstrate that both the magnitude of the barrier $U_{FA}$ and the angle between the two $4f$ moments are determined directly from precise temperature-dependent magnetization data to an accuracy better than $1^{\circ}$. The experimentally found angles between the $4f$ moments are in excellent agreement with calculated angles between the quantisation axes of the two Dy ions. Theory indicates a larger deviation of the orientation of the Dy magnetic moments from the Dy bond axes to the central ion in Dy$_2$TiC@C$_{80}$. This may explain the lower stability of the magnetisation in Dy$_2$TiC@C$_{80}$, although it exhibits a $\sim 49\%$ stronger exchange coupling than in Dy$_2$ScN@C$_{80}$.
Materials Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to solve the problems of the angle measurement between two magnetic moments and the configurational stability in single - molecule magnets (SMMs). Specifically, the research objects are two binuclear lanthanide SMMs: Dy₂ScN@C₈₀ and Dy₂TiC@C₈₀. ### Main problems: 1. **Accurate angle measurement**: How to accurately measure the angle between these two magnetic moments and their configurational stability. 2. **Understanding magnetic differences**: Explain why, although Dy₂TiC@C₈₀ has stronger exchange coupling, its magnetization stability is not as good as that of Dy₂ScN@C₈₀. ### Solutions: - **Pseudo - spin model**: The previously used pseudo - spin model for describing binuclear endohedral fullerenes was extended to consider the change in the direction of the single - ion anisotropy axis and applied to these two SMMs. - **Experimental data**: Through temperature - dependent magnetization data, the protection barrier \( U_{FA} \) and the angle between the two magnetic moments were extracted with an accuracy within 1°. - **Theoretical calculations**: Through density functional theory (DFT) and complete active space self - consistent field (CASSCF) calculations, the experimental results were verified, and the deviation between the magnetic moment direction and the bond angle was explained. ### Key findings: - **Angle measurement**: The angles between the two magnetic moments in Dy₂ScN@C₈₀ and Dy₂TiC@C₈₀ measured experimentally are 117.1° ± 0.8° and 115.2° ± 0.7° respectively. - **Barrier height**: Although Dy₂TiC@C₈₀ has higher exchange and dipole barriers, its zero - field lifetime is shorter, indicating that a larger barrier does not necessarily mean better magnetic stability. - **Magnetic moment deviation**: The deviation of the magnetic moment direction from the Dy - N or Dy - C bond direction in Dy₂TiC@C₈₀ is larger, which may lead to its lower axial symmetry and higher relaxation rate. ### Conclusion: By accurately measuring the angle between magnetic moments, the study reveals that the reason for the poor magnetic stability of Dy₂TiC@C₈₀ lies in its large non - axial symmetry and high relaxation rate. These findings provide important theoretical and experimental bases for designing more stable single - molecule magnets.