Abstract:We present a drift–diffusion model of a perovskite solar cell (PSC) in which carrier transport in the charge transport layers (TLs) is not based on the Boltzmann approximation to the Fermi–Dirac (FD) statistical distribution, in contrast to previously studied models. At sufficiently high carrier densities the Boltzmann approximation breaks down and the precise form of the density of states function (often assumed to be parabolic) has a significant influence on carrier transport. In particular, parabolic, Kane and Gaussian models of the density of states are discussed in depth and it is shown that the discrepancies between the Boltzmann approximation and the full FD statistical model are particularly marked for the Gaussian model, which is typically used to describe organic semiconducting TLs. Comparison is made between full device models, using parameter values taken from the literature, in which carrier motion in the TLs is described using (I) the full FD statistical model and (II) the Boltzmann approximation. For a representative TiO 2 /MAPI/Spiro device the behaviour of the PSC predicted by the Boltzmann-based model shows significant differences compared to that predicted by the FD-based model. This holds both at steady-state, where the Boltzmann treatment overestimates the power conversion efficiency by a factor of 27%, compared to the FD treatment, and in dynamic simulations of current–voltage hysteresis and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. This suggests that the standard approach, in which carrier transport in the TLs is modelled based on the Boltzmann approximation, is inadequate. Furthermore, we show that the full FD treatment gives a more accurate representation of the steady-state performance, compared to the standard Boltzmann treatment, as measured against experimental data reported in the literature for typical TiO 2 /MAPI/Spiro devices.

Highly conductive charge transport layers impair charge extraction selectivity in thin-film solar cells

Characterizing the Influence of Charge Extraction Layers on the Performance of Triple‐Cation Perovskite Solar Cells

Understanding the Limitations of Charge Transporting Layers in Mixed Lead–Tin Halide Perovskite Solar Cells

Charge Carrier Recombination at Perovskite/Hole Transport Layer Interfaces Monitored by Time-Resolved Spectroscopy

Charge transport and extraction of PTB7:PC71BM organic solar cells: effect of film thickness and thermal-annealing

Anion‐Doped Thickness‐Insensitive Electron Transport Layer for Efficient Organic Solar Cell

Anion-Doped Thickness-Insensitive Electron Transport Layer for Efficient Organic Solar Cells.

Extraction Current Transients for Selective Charge-Carrier Mobility Determination in Non-Fullerene and Ternary Bulk Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells

Crucial role of charge transporting layers on ion migration in perovskite solar cells

Solution-processed and thickness-insensitive hole transport layer for high efficiency organic solar cells

The perovskite/transport layer interfaces dominate non-radiative recombination in efficient perovskite solar cells

Charge transport modelling of perovskite solar cells accounting for non-Boltzmann statistics in organic and highly-doped transport layers

Distinguishing Carrier Transport and Interfacial Recombination at Perovskite-Transport Layer Interfaces Using Ultrafast Spectroscopy and Numerical Simulation

Minimizing performance degradation induced by interfacial recombination in perovskite solar cells through tailoring of the transport layer electronic properties

Large Active Layer Thickness Toleration Of High-Efficiency Small Molecule Solar Cells

Recent Advancements in Enhancing Interfacial Charge Transport for Perovskite Solar Cells

Charge Carrier Extraction by Linearly Increasing Voltage:Analytic framework and ambipolar transients

Charge Transport and Extraction of Bilayer Interdiffusion Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells

Modeling based screening for optimal carrier selective material for Si based solar cells

Study on the Property of Electron-Transport Layer in the Doped Formamidinium Lead Iodide Perovskite Based on DFT

Study of Electron Transport Layer‐Free and Hole Transport Layer‐Free Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells