Abstract:The dreaming Hopfield model constitutes a generalization of the Hebbian paradigm for neural networks, that is able to perform on-line learning when "awake" and also to account for off-line "sleeping" mechanisms. The latter have been shown to enhance storing in such a way that, in the long sleep-time limit, this model can reach the maximal storage capacity achievable by networks equipped with symmetric pairwise interactions. In this paper, we inspect the minimal amount of information that must be supplied to such a network to guarantee a successful generalization, and we test it both on random synthetic and on standard structured datasets (i.e., MNIST, Fashion-MNIST and Olivetti). By comparing these minimal thresholds of information with those required by the standard (i.e., always "awake") Hopfield model, we prove that the present network can save up to ∼90% of the dataset size, yet preserving the same performance of the standard counterpart. This suggests that sleep may play a pivotal role in explaining the gap between the large volumes of data required to train artificial neural networks and the relatively small volumes needed by their biological counterparts. Further, we prove that the model Cost function (typically used in statistical mechanics) admits a representation in terms of a standard Loss function (typically used in machine learning) and this allows us to analyze its emergent computational skills both theoretically and computationally: a quantitative picture of its capabilities as a function of its control parameters is achieved and consistency between the two approaches is highlighted. The resulting network is an associative memory for pattern recognition tasks that learns from examples on-line, generalizes correctly (in suitable regions of its control parameters) and optimizes its storage capacity by off-line sleeping: such a reduction of the training cost can be inspiring toward sustainable AI and in situations where data are relatively sparse.

Supervised perceptron learning vs unsupervised Hebbian unlearning: Approaching optimal memory retrieval in Hopfield-like networks

A spectral approach to Hebbian-like neural networks

Hebbian Learning from First Principles

Demolition and Reinforcement of Memories in Spin-Glass-like Neural Networks

Eigenvector Dreaming

Dreaming neural networks: Forgetting spurious memories and reinforcing pure ones

Distributed Memory and Localized Memory in Neural Networks

Hopfield model with planted patterns: a teacher-student self-supervised learning model

Hebbian dreaming for small datasets

Efficient supervised learning in networks with binary synapses

Prototype Analysis in Hopfield Networks with Hebbian Learning

Learning associative memories by error backpropagation.

Unsupervised and Supervised learning by Dense Associative Memory under replica symmetry breaking

Effect of spatial correlations on Hopfield Neural Network and Dense Associative Memories

Modeling Hebb Learning Rule for Unsupervised Learning.

Unsupervised learning by a nonlinear network with Hebbian excitatory and anti-Hebbian inhibitory neurons

Dense Hebbian neural networks: a replica symmetric picture of supervised learning

Input-Driven Dynamics for Robust Memory Retrieval in Hopfield Networks

Synaptically Distributed Memory Vs. Synaptically Localized Memory

Brain memory working. Optimal control behavior for improved Hopfield-like models