Improving clinician self-awareness and increasing accurate representation of clinical competencies.
Scott H. Waltman,Sarah A. Frankel,Michael A. Williston
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pri0000026
2016-09-01
Practice Innovations
Abstract:In keeping with aspirational principles and adhering to the ethical standards of psychology, clinicians should strive to provide the highest possible quality of care and to represent their competencies accurately to potential clients. Yet how are clinicians to gauge their own competence in order to determine if they are adhering to these ethical standards and principles? Research suggests that, unfortunately, clinicians may not be the best reporters of their own abilities (Creed, Wolk, Feinberg, Evans, & Beck, 2016; Mathieson, Barnfield, & Beaumont, 2009). The current article discusses several possible explanations for this finding, including cognitive biases (e.g., better-than-average bias; J. D. Brown, 1986), therapist drift (Waller & Turner, 2016), and therapist burnout (Maslach, Schaufeli, & Leiter, 2001). Several approaches for improving clinicians’ self-awareness are discussed and practical suggestions are made. Benefits of peer consultation are highlighted, and strategies for identifying appropriate consultation group members and fostering vulnerability among members are encouraged. In addition, clinicians are urged to utilize objective tools for assessing therapeutic competence, including work sample review and outcome tracking measures. In each case, barriers to utilizing these tools and strategies to overcome these obstacles are addressed. Finally, the value of certification through an accredited body using blind, objective ratings of work products is discussed. These strategies are suggested to help improve clinician self-awareness, allowing for more accurate representation of clinical competencies, an important step toward improving access to quality health services for individuals seeking psychotherapy.
English Else