Abstract:Cross-national research on cultural differences across space and time intersects multiple disciplines but the prominence of concepts varies by academic fields. Hofstede’s dimensional concept of culture, to begin with, dominates in cross-cultural psychology and international management. Inglehart’s dynamic concept of culture, by contrast, prevails in sociology and political science. We argue that this disciplinary division is unfortunate because the two concepts are complementary, for which reason a synthesis rectifies their mutual weaknesses. Indeed, while Hofstede’s dimensional concept neglects cultural dynamics, Inglehart’s dynamic concept is dimensionally reductionist. We demonstrate empirically that combining these two concepts leads to an improved understanding of cultural differences. Inspired by Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, we use data from the European Value Studies and World Values Surveys for 495,011 individuals born between 1900 and 1999 in 110 countries and then show that change on these dimensions proceeds as Inglehart and his collaborators suggest. Most notably, younger generations have become more individualistic and more joyous. But even though economic development and generational replacement drive this cultural change, roughly half of the variation in national cultural orientations is unique to each country, due to lasting intercept differences in developmental trajectories that trace back to remote historic drivers. We discuss the implications for cross-national cultural research.

Attitudes, Values and Organizational Culture: Disentangling the Concepts

Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations

Examining the impact of Culture's consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede's cultural value dimensions.

Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations

THE CONTENT AND CONTEXT OF ORGANIZATIONAL ETHICS

Hofstede's Culture Dimensions

Measuring Cultural Dimensions: External Validity and Internal Consistency of Hofstede's VSM 2013 Scales

The Bureaucrat, the Businessperson, and Their Perceptions of Each Other's Value Orientation: Empirical Notions on the Other Sector's Most Important Organizational Values

An Investigation into Organizational Culture and Hoe it Affects Employee Behavior

Are Individual-Level and Country-Level Value Structures Different? Testing Hofstede’s Legacy With the Schwartz Value Survey

Power Distance, Individualism/Collectivism, and Job-Related Attitudes in a Culturally Diverse Work Group

The business of international business is culture

Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede With Inglehart

Value Solidity in Government and Business: Results of an Empirical Study on Public and Private Sector Organizational Values

Personality and Culture Revisited: Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture

An Empirical Study of Classification of Organizational Culture within the Chinese Context

SUPPORT FROM THE ORGANIZATION AND CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIORS: DO CULTURAL VALUES MATTER?

Think Locally, Act Globally: Cultural Constraints in Personnel Management

Identity, Importance, and Their Roles in How Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Workplace Attitudes and Behavior

Organizational culture and the individuals' discretionary behaviors at work: a cross-cultural analysis