Abstract:We attempt to bridge the value – action paradox inhibiting environmental action by drawing upon work cast within conservation psychology to identify mechanisms by which the processes driving action can be shaped to achieve more sustainable outcomes. The shift toward a more mutualistic orientation with nature suggests the possibility of increasing success of treatments aimed at manipulating the endogenous psychological process (i.e., attitudes, knowledge, efficacy, norms) stemming from value orientation. While empirical evidence illustrates that values can be slow to change, the psychological processes situated higher within the cognitive hierarchy are more susceptible to manipulation. The need for behavioral change is imminent. While developed societies have, for the most part, modernized to the extent basic human needs are amply satisfied, the economic development that has accompanied modernization has coupled economic growth with an unsustainable consumption of natural resources and rising emissions. An increasing number of researchers and activists have called for a transition to a global steady-state economy. We suggest that shifting societal values present an opportunity for modern society to capitalize on humans’ increasing empathy for the natural world and to act in more sustainable ways. Research illustrates that those expressing a stronger affinity toward nature (e.g., mutualists) are more inclined to agree with statements suggesting that environmental protection should be prioritized over economic growth and that climate change is primarily driven by the burning of fossil fuels. Unfortunately, as it presently stands, those most inclined to express this sentiment (i.e., those reporting higher incomes, more years of formal education, and residing in urbanized environments) are also more likely to act in ways that contribute to climate change (e.g., car usage, air travel, household energy use). It is a troubling paradox given they have greater capacity for reducing their ecological footprint. With human values shifting toward a more empathetic orientation toward nature, our review implies that now more than ever, efforts to manipulate elements of the cognitive hierarchy are likely to result in behavioral change that can minimize many anthropogenic drivers of climate change.

Conservation or the moral high ground: siding with Bentham or Kant

Compassionate versus consequentialist conservation

Public perceptions of trophy hunting are pragmatic, not dogmatic

Ten years of coverage of trophy hunting in UK newspapers

The moral landscape of biological conservation: Understanding conceptual and normative foundations

Taking natural harms seriously in compassionate conservation

The significance of African lions for the financial viability of trophy hunting and the maintenance of wild land

The Death of an Elephant: Conservation Discourses Versus Practices in Africa

Exploring the efficacy of identity priming and message framing in influencing American attitudes toward trophy hunting

Comparing U.S. public attitudes regarding hunting and trophy hunting and exploring perceptions of trophy hunting using social license to operate

Disproportionate regulation of wildlife trade

Why conserve biodiversity? A multi-national exploration of stakeholders’ views on the arguments for biodiversity conservation

The need for ecocentrism in biodiversity conservation

Modernity and the western value-action paradox: contributions from conservation psychology

Time to agree on a conservation benchmark for Australia.

Conservation and human rights: The public commitments of international conservation organizations

Conservation ethics and anaesthesia

The use and abuse of moral theories in conservation debate about killing animals

Is trophy hunting a real sport?

Marine mammal conservation in the 21st century: A plea for a paradigm shift towards mindful conservation

Why humans kill animals and why we cannot avoid it