Abstract:Quantum theory famously entails the existence of incompatible measurements, pairs of system observables which cannot be simultaneously measured to arbitrary precision. Incompatibility is widely regarded to be a uniquely quantum phenomenon, linked to failure to commute of quantum operators. Even in the face of deep parallels between quantum commutators and classical Poisson brackets, no connection has been established between the Poisson algebra and any intrinsic limitations to classical measurement. Here I examine measurement in classical Hamiltonian physics as a process involving the joint evolution of an object-system and a finite-temperature measuring apparatus. Instead of the ideal measurement capable of extracting information without disturbing the system, I find a Heisenberg-like precision-disturbance relation: Measuring an observable leaves all Poisson-commuting observables undisturbed but inevitably disturbs all non-Poisson-commuting observables. In this classical uncertainty relation the role of h-bar is played by an apparatus-specific quantity, q-bar. While this is not a universal constant, the analysis suggests that q-bar takes a finite positive value for any apparatus that can be built. (Specifically: q-bar vanishes in the model only in the unreachable limit of zero absolute temperature.) I show that a classical version of Ozawa's model of quantum measurement [Ozawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 , 385 (1988)], originally proposed as a means to violate Heisenberg's relation, does not violate the classical relation. If this result were to generalize to all models of measurement, then incompatibility would prove to be a feature not only of quantum, but of classical physics too. Put differently: The approach presented here points the way to studying the (Bayesian) epistemology of classical physics, which was until now assumed to be trivial. It now seems possible that it is nontrivial and bears a resemblance to the quantum formalism. The present findings may be of interest to researchers working on foundations of quantum mechanics, particularly for ψ -epistemic interpretations. More practically, there may be applications in the fields of precision measurement, nanoengineering, and molecular machines. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.110.024124 ©2024 American Physical Society

The range of elementary interactions: a criticism of the standard classroom approach

Effective interactions are effective interactions

A Generalized Theory of Interactions -- I. The General Problem

The role of the effective range in strongly-interacting few-body systems

Inconsistencies and errors in traditional approaches to energy in our introductory courses

Disproving Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation

Interpretations and naturalness in the radiation-reaction problem

Presentation of the electromagnetic field in introductory physics textbooks and consequences for its teaching

Linear Response Theory with finite-range interactions

How far away is infinity? An electromagnetic exercise to develop intuition regarding models

Incompatible observables in classical physics: A closer look at measurement in Hamiltonian mechanics

Considerations about the incompleteness of the Ehrenfest's theorem in quantum mechanics

Responding to objections made by Sorin Coşofreţ concerning kinetic molecular theory: an illustration of how to teach physics students to evaluate pseudoscientific work

The Mathematics of High School Physics

On a family of finitely many point interaction Hamiltonians free of ultraviolet pathologies

Una interpretación física de la constante de Planck

A new look at the theory of point interactions

Exercises are problems too: implications for teaching problem-solving in introductory physics courses

Observations on teaching first-year physics

The Fundamental Concepts of Classical Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics

Exploring the implications of the uncertainty relationships in quantum mechanics