Abstract:The CIELAB lightness and chroma values of pixels in five of the eight ISO SCID natural images were modified to produce sample images. Pairs of images were displayed on a calibrated monitor and assessed by a panel of 12 observers with normal color vision using a categorical judgment method. The experimental results showed that assuming the lightness parametric factor k(L)=1 to predict color differences in images, CIELAB performed better than CIEDE2000, CIE94, or CMC, which is a different result to the one found in color-difference literature for homogeneous color pairs. However, observers perceived CIELAB lightness and chroma differences in images in different ways. To fit current experimental data, a specific methodology is proposed to optimize k(L) in the color-difference formulas CIELAB, CIEDE2000, CIE94, and CMC. From the standardized residual sum of squares (STRESS) index, it was found that the optimized formulas, CIEDE2000(2.3:1), CIE94(3.0:1), and CMC(3.4:1), performed significantly better than their corresponding original forms with lightness parametric factor k(L)=1. Specifically, CIEDE2000(2.3:1) performed the best, with a satisfactory average STRESS value of 25.8, which is very similar to the 27.5 value that was found from the CIEDE2000(1:1) formula for the combined weighted dataset of homogeneous color samples employed at the development of this formula [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A25, 1828 (2008), Table 2]. However, fitting our experimental data, none of the four optimized formulas CIELAB(1.5:1), CIEDE2000(2.3:1), CIE94(3.0:1), and CMC(3.4:1) is significantly better than the others. Current results roughly agree with the recent CIE recommendation that color difference in images can be predicted by simply adopting a lightness parametric factor k(L)=2 in CIELAB or CIEDE2000 [CIE Publication 199:2011]. It was also found that the different contents of the five images have considerable influence on the performance of the tested color-difference formulas.

Lightness modification method considering chromaticity loss for dichromats

Image Recoloring for Red-Green Dichromats with Compensation Range-Based Naturalness Preservation and Refined Dichromacy Gamut

Re-coloring Images for Dichromats Based on an Improved Adaptive Mapping Algorithm

Fast Contrast and Naturalness Preserving Image Recolouring for Dichromats.

Color Enhancement Algorithm Based on Daltonization and Image Fusion for Improving the Color Visibility to Color Vision Deficiencies and Normal Trichromats.

Color Discrimination Enhancement for Dichromats Using Self-Organizing Color Transformation

Perceptual Uniformity-Aware Image Recoloring Method for Red-Green Anomalous Trichromacy

Fast image recoloring for red–green anomalous trichromacy with contrast enhancement and naturalness preservation

Color Retinal Image Enhancement Based on Luminosity and Contrast Adjustment

An Efficient Direct Volume Rendering Approach for Dichromats

Color Constancy-Based Visibility Enhancement in Low-Light Conditions

A Fixed Transformation Of Color Images For Dichromats Based On Similarity Matrices

Luminance Weighted Color Constancy

An Efficient Recoloring Method for Color Vision Deficiency Based on Color Confidence and Difference

Image enhancement based on adaptive demarcation between underexposure and overexposure

Adaptive Color Contrast Enhancement for Digital Images

Efficient Global Color, Luminance, and Contrast Consistency Optimization for Multiple Remote Sensing Images

Color-difference evaluation for digital images using a categorical judgment method.

Acquisition of Vision Adaptability Image

A lightness-aware loss for low-light image enhancement

Quaternion Chromaticity Contrast Preserving Decolorization Method Based on Adaptive Singular Value Weighting