Abstract:Surface turbulent exchanges play a key role on sea ice dynamics, on ocean and sea ice heat budgets and on the polar atmosphere. Uncertainties in parameterizations of surface turbulent fluxes are mostly held by the transfer coefficients and estimates of those transfer coefficients from field data are required for parameterization development. Measurement errors propagate through the computation of transfer coefficients and contribute to its total error together with the uncertainties in the empirical stability functions used to correct for stability effects. Here we propose a methodology to assess their contributions individually to each coefficient estimate as well as the total drag coefficient uncertainty and we apply this methodology on the example of the SHEBA campaign. We conclude that for most common drag coefficient values (between and ), the relative total uncertainty ranges from 25 and 50 . For stable or unstable conditions with a stability parameter on average, the total uncertainty in the neutral drag coefficient exceeds the neutral drag coefficient value itself, while for the total uncertainty is around 25 of the drag coefficient. For closer-to-neutral conditions, this uncertainty is dominated by measurement uncertainties in surface turbulent momentum fluxes which should therefore be the target of efforts in uncertainty reduction. We also propose an objective data-screening procedure for field data, which consists of retaining data for which the relative error on neutral drag coefficient does not exceed a given threshold. This method, in addition to the commonly used flux quality control procedure, allows for a reduction of the drag coefficient dispersion compared to other data-screening methods, which we take as an indication of better dataset quality.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to solve the problem of uncertainty in the estimation of the sea - ice surface drag coefficient. Specifically, the research focuses on how to evaluate the uncertainty of the drag coefficient from field data, and proposes a method to separately evaluate the influence of measurement errors and stability function uncertainties on the total uncertainty of the drag coefficient. Through this method, the author hopes to improve the understanding of the turbulent exchange process on the sea - ice surface, and further improve the accuracy of relevant parameterizations in climate models. ### Background and Problems of the Paper The Arctic sea ice has experienced a significant reduction in the past few decades. This phenomenon is regarded as an iconic signal of climate change and is considered to have affected the climate in the mid - latitude regions. However, the current state - of - the - art climate models have difficulties in accurately capturing the speed of Arctic climate change and its impact on the climate in North America and Europe. One of the important sources of uncertainty is the turbulent heat flux in the sea - ice surface energy budget. These fluxes play a crucial role in sea - ice dynamics, ocean and sea - ice heat budgets, and the polar atmosphere. In sea - ice and climate models, the atmospheric boundary - layer parameterization method based on the Monin - Obukhov similarity theory (MOST) is usually used to represent the momentum, sensible heat, and latent heat fluxes between the surface and the atmosphere. The accuracy of these parameterizations mainly depends on the accuracy of the transfer coefficients, especially the momentum transfer coefficient (i.e., the drag coefficient \( C_D \)). The estimation of the drag coefficient depends on field observation data, but the measurement errors in these data will propagate into the calculation of the transfer coefficient, thereby increasing its total uncertainty. ### Research Methods This paper proposes a method for evaluating the individual contributions of measurement errors and stability function uncertainties to the drag coefficient estimation and their total uncertainty. This method is applied to the data of the SHEBA (Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean) field observation campaign. The specific steps include: 1. **Propagation of Measurement Errors**: Consider the random errors of each variable (such as wind speed \( U \), virtual temperature \( \theta_v \), etc.), and calculate the random error of the drag coefficient \( C_D \) through the error - propagation formula. 2. **Uncertainty of the Stability Function**: Evaluate the uncertainty of the stability function \( \psi_m(\zeta) \) through the bootstrap method. Specifically, resample the observation data, calculate the \( \psi_m(\zeta) \) function under different conditions, and evaluate its variability. ### Main Conclusions - For common drag coefficient values (ranging between \( 1.0\times10^{- 3} \) and \( 2.5\times10^{-3} \)), the relative total uncertainty ranges from 25% to 50%. - Under stable or unstable conditions (stability parameter \( |\zeta|>1 \)), the total uncertainty of the neutral drag coefficient exceeds its own value; while under near - neutral conditions ( \( |\zeta| < 1 \)), the total uncertainty is approximately 25% of the drag coefficient. - The uncertainty under near - neutral conditions is mainly dominated by the uncertainty of the surface momentum turbulent flux measurement. Therefore, reducing the uncertainty of these measurements should be the focus of future research. ### Data Screening Method This paper also proposes an objective data screening method, that is, to retain the data with relative errors within a given threshold. This method, combined with the commonly used flux quality - control procedures, can reduce the dispersion of the drag coefficient, thereby improving the quality of the data set. ### Significance and Application Through this method, researchers can more accurately evaluate and reduce the uncertainty in the drag coefficient estimation, thereby improving the accuracy of relevant parameterizations in climate models and better understanding the changes of Arctic sea ice and their impact on the global climate.

Uncertainties of Drag Coefficient Estimates Above Sea Ice from Field Data

Assessment of Surface Drag Coefficient Parametrizations Based on Observations and Simulations Using the Weather Research and Forecasting Model

Dependency of the drag coefficient on boundary layer stability beneath drifting sea ice in the central Arctic Ocean

On the Parameterization of Drag Coefficient over Sea Surface

Uncertainty in Air–sea CO2 Flux Due to Transfer Velocity

Reducing Parametrization Errors for Polar Surface Turbulent Fluxes Using Machine Learning

Turbulent Heat Fluxes over Arctic Sea Ice: Measurements and Evaluation of Recent Parameterizations

Drag Model from Interface-Resolved Simulations of Particle Sedimentation in a Periodic Domain and Vertical Turbulent Channel Flows

The Influence of Advection Schemes and Turbulence Closure Models on Drag Coefficient Calculation Around a Circular Cylinder at High Reynolds Number

Modeling of the drag and thermal conductivity coefficients in tropical cyclones taking into account foam cover

Estimates of Spherical Satellite Drag Coefficients in the Upper Thermosphere During Different Geomagnetic Conditions

Investigation of Air-Sea Turbulent Momentum Flux over the Aegean Sea with a Wind-Wave Coupling Model

An assessment of effective slope as a parameter for turbulent drag prediction over multi-scaled roughness

Surface roughness effects on transonic aircraft performance: experimental/numerical comparisons

Impact of internal wave drag on Arctic sea ice

Theoretical analyses of the sub-grid quantities' effect on filtered Eulerian drag force

Improvement of Drag Coefficient Calculation under Near‐Neutral Conditions in Light Winds over Land

Data-integrated uncertainty quantification for the performance prediction of iced airfoils

Quantitative assessment of two oil-in-ice surface drift algorithms

Effects of Drag Coefficients on Surface Heat Flux during Typhoon Kalmaegi (2014)

Predict Aerodynamic Drag of Spacecraft in Very Low Earth Orbit Using Different Gas-Surface Interaction Models