Greater accuracy of radiomics compared to deep learning to discriminate normal subjects from patients with dementia: a whole brain 18FDG PET analysis
Alberto Bestetti,Luigi Calabrese,Vincenzo Parini,Carla Fornara
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/mnm.0000000000001810
2024-03-08
Nuclear Medicine Communications
Abstract:Dementia, including Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative disorders, poses significant diagnostic challenges due to its complex and heterogeneous nature [ 1 ]. FDG PET imaging offers valuable insights into the functional alterations of the brain by measuring regional cerebral glucose metabolism. Radiomics and deep learning techniques provide complementary approaches for analyzing FDG PET images, enabling quantitative and automated evaluation [ 2 ]. Deep learning techniques, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have shown remarkable performance in image analysis tasks. When applied to FDG PET images, deep learning models can learn complex patterns and relationships directly from the data without relying on predefined features. CNNs can be trained to classify dementias, identify biomarkers, and detect subtle changes in FDG uptake patterns, offering high accuracy and efficiency in the evaluation process [ 3–6 ]. The majority of these studies for AD diagnosis were conducted on MRI scans. Liu et al . [ 3 ] used multiple deep 3D-CNN on different local image patches to learn the discriminative features of MRI and FDG PET images, obtained from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset. The classification performance for AD/HC diagnosis was 93.26%. Radiomics involves the extraction of a vast array of quantitative features from medical images, encompassing various aspects such as intensity, shape, texture, and spatial relationships. In the context of FDG PET, radiomic analysis can provide valuable information about metabolic patterns, heterogeneity, and regional changes in glucose metabolism. These quantitative features have the potential to aid in differentiating dementias, predicting disease progression, and evaluating treatment response [ 7–9 ]. Yupeng Li et al . [ 9 ] assessed FDG PET and clinical cognitive scales in AD, MCI (Mild Cognitive Impairment) and HC subjects, from ADNI cohorts. They determined the brain region of interest involved (ROIs), comparing, by a two-sample Student test, AD patients and HC and used them to radiomic analysis. Pearson's correlation coefficients were regarded to select effective features associated with the clinical cognitive scales. Using a support vector machine as test classifier, an accuracy of 91.5% was obtained for classifying AD vs. HC.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging