Abstract:Many important protein–protein interactions are mediated by peptide recognition modular domains, such as the Src homology 3 (SH3), SH2, PDZ, and WW domains. Characterizing the interaction interface of domain–peptide complexes and predicting binding specificity for modular domains are critical for deciphering protein–protein interaction networks. Here, we propose the use of an energetic decomposition analysis to characterize domain–peptide interactions and the molecular interaction energy components (MIECs), including van der Waals, electrostatic, and desolvation energy between residue pairs on the binding interface. We show a proof-of-concept study on the amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain interacting with its peptide ligands. The structures of the human amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain complexed with 884 peptides were first modeled using virtual mutagenesis and optimized by molecular mechanics (MM) minimization. Next, the MIECs between domain and peptide residues were computed using the MM/generalized Born decomposition analysis. We conducted two types of statistical analyses on the MIECs to demonstrate their usefulness for predicting binding affinities of peptides and for classifying peptides into binder and non-binder categories. First, combining partial least squares analysis and genetic algorithm, we fitted linear regression models between the MIECs and the peptide binding affinities on the training data set. These models were then used to predict binding affinities for peptides in the test data set; the predicted values have a correlation coefficient of 0.81 and an unsigned mean error of 0.39 compared with the experimentally measured ones. The partial least squares–genetic algorithm analysis on the MIECs revealed the critical interactions for the binding specificity of the amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain. Next, a support vector machine (SVM) was employed to build classification models based on the MIECs of peptides in the training set. A rigorous training-validation procedure was used to assess the performances of different kernel functions in SVM and different combinations of the MIECs. The best SVM classifier gave satisfactory predictions for the test set, indicated by average prediction accuracy rates of 78% and 91% for the binding and non-binding peptides, respectively. We also showed that the performance of our approach on both binding affinity prediction and binder/non-binder classification was superior to the performances of the conventional MM/Poisson–Boltzmann solvent-accessible surface area and MM/generalized Born solvent-accessible surface area calculations. Our study demonstrates that the analysis of the MIECs between peptides and the SH3 domain can successfully characterize the binding interface, and it provides a framework to derive integrated prediction models for different domain–peptide systems.

Structure-based characterization of the binding of peptide to the human endophilin-1 Src homology 3 domain using position-dependent noncovalent potential analysis

Molecular Insight into Protein Binding Orientations and Interaction Modes on Hydrophobic Charge-Induction Resin.

Proteome-Wide Inference of Human Endophilin 1-Binding Peptides

Exploring the Binding Mechanism Between Human Profilin (PFN1) and Polyproline-10 Through Binding Mode Screening

Characterization of PDZ Domain–peptide Interactions Using an Integrated Protocol of QM/MM, PB/SA, and CFEA Analyses

Prediction of binding affinities between the human amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain and its peptide ligands using homology modeling, molecular dynamics and molecular field analysis.

Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Model for Prediction of Protein–Peptide Interaction Binding Affinities Between Human Amphiphysin-1 SH3 Domains and Their Peptide Ligands

Characterization of Domain–Peptide Interaction Interface: A Case Study on the Amphiphysin-1 SH3 Domain

Integrated unsupervised–supervised modeling and prediction of protein–peptide affinities at structural level

Modeling and Predicting Interactions Between the Human Amphiphysin SH3 Domains and Their Peptide Ligands Based on Amino Acid Information.

Applying Chemometrics Approaches to Model and Predict the Binding Affinities Between the Human Amphiphysin Sh3 Domain and Its Peptide Ligands

Computational Analysis and Prediction of the Binding Motif and Protein Interacting Partners of the Abl SH3 Domain

Development of QSAR-Improved Statistical Potential for the Structure-Based Analysis of ProteinPeptide Binding Affinities

Characterization of Domain-Peptide Interaction Interface: A Generic Structure-based Model to Decipher the Binding Specificity of SH3 Domains

Molecular dynamics simulation of the interactions between EHD1 EH domain and multiple peptides

Modeling and Prediction of Binding Affinities Between the Human Amphiphysin SH3 Domain and Its Peptide Ligands Using Genetic Algorithm‐gaussian Processes

Modeling protein-peptide recognition based on classical quantitative structure-affinity relationship approach: implication for proteome-wide inference of peptide-mediated interactions

Characterization of PDZ Domain‐peptide Interaction Interface Based on Energetic Patterns

Affinity Enhancement by Ligand Clustering Effect Inspired by Peptide Dendrimers-Shank Pdz Proteins Interactions

Identification Of 14-3-3 Proteins Phosphopeptide-Binding Specificity Using An Affinity-Based Computational Approach

Rational design of potent phosphopeptide binders to endocrine Snk PBD domain by integrating machine learning optimization, molecular dynamics simulation, binding energetics rescoring, and in vitro affinity assay