Specialist Palliative Care Engagement in Adult ECMO Cases Through the COVID Pandemic (GP147)

Astrid Grouls,Yangseon Kim,Bindu Akkanti,Elizabeth Kvale
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.02.536
IF: 5.576
2024-04-19
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Abstract:Outcomes 1. Recognize the value of pilot work targeting the breadth of specialists involved in ECMO work. 2. Discuss the breadth of disseminations techniques needed to reach a diverse and multi-disciplinary audience. Key Message Preliminary survey work was performed to evaluate the frequency of specialist palliative care involvement in adult ECMO cases through the COVID pandemic, given the delays in NIS and ELSO registries. The trends identified and the concept work of this survey will serve to guide wider international work on this topic. Importance In the fast-paced world of extracorporeal life support, specialist palliative care must have timely access to data on their utilization, which is presently limited by time delays in the NIS and the reporting requirements of the ELSO registry. This survey acts as conceptual work for a larger survey to follow on the role of specialist palliative care for adult persons requiring ECMO. Objective(s) The purpose of this research is to estimate palliative involvement in the care of ECMO patients during the COVID pandemic. Scientific Methods Utilized A 19-item survey was developed collaboratively with input from SPC and critical care clinicians. It was distributed to SPC, intensivists and surgeons who self-reported seeing adult patients on ECMO during the COVID pandemic. Survey recipients were identified through known email addresses, snowballing strategies, and through Extracorporeal Life Support (ELSO)-sponsored WhatsApp groups for ECMO providers. Descriptive analysis was performed. Results A total of 46 surveys were completed in the period of September to October 2023, the majority of which were SPC (20) and intensivists (24) in the South (20; 46%). Among all respondents, 65% noted an increase in SPC involvement in adult VV-ECMO cases through the COVID pandemic (60% SPC subgroup, 67% critical care subgroup). Most respondents (28, 61%) reported no pre-existing SPC consultation protocols for patients on ECMO at their institutions. Most respondents indicated that since the COVID pandemic, SPC had a stronger relationship with intensivists (67%, 31/46), a larger scope of care (61%; 28/46) and was more positively received (61%; 28/46). 12 respondents requested increased SPC staffing and education about ECMO. 22 cited insufficient staffing of SPC as a barrier to consultation. 61% of respondents identified SPC protocols as helpful when they included duration of time on ECMO and clinical criteria as compared to just time-based (15%) or clinical-based (24%). Conclusion(s) Preliminary data from both SPC and critical care clinicians suggest that SPC consultation frequency for adult patients on ECMO increased during the COVID pandemic. Participants reported an increase in SPC scope and improved interprofessional collaboration. Impact To better understand these trends we will undertake a wider survey of international ECMO practice, and compare our data with reports of SPC engagement in the ELSO registry and National Inpatient Survey data sets.
medicine, general & internal,clinical neurology,health care sciences & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?