Low toxicity of HfO2, SiO2, Al2O3 and CeO2 nanoparticles to the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Citlali García-Saucedo,James A Field,Lila Otero-Gonzalez,Reyes Sierra-Álvarez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.081
2011-09-15
Abstract:Increasing use of nanomaterials necessitates an improved understanding of their potential impact on environment health. This study evaluated the cytotoxicity of nanosized HfO(2), SiO(2), Al(2)O(3) and CeO(2) towards the eukaryotic model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and characterized their state of dispersion in bioassay medium. Nanotoxicity was assessed by monitoring oxygen consumption in batch cultures and by analysis of cell membrane integrity. CeO(2), Al(2)O(3), and HfO(2) nanoparticles were highly unstable in yeast medium and formed micron-sized, settleable agglomerates. A non-toxic polyacrylate dispersant (Dispex A40) was used to improve nanoparticle stability and determine the impact of enhanced dispersion on toxicity. None of the NPs tested without dispersant inhibited O(2) uptake by yeast at concentrations as high as 1000 mg/L. Dispersant supplementation only enhanced the toxicity of CeO(2) (47% at 1000 mg/L). Dispersed SiO(2) and Al(2)O(3) (1000 mg/L) caused cell membrane damage, whereas dispersed HfO(2) and CeO(2) did not cause significant disruption of membrane integrity at the same concentration. These results suggest that the O(2) uptake inhibition observed with dispersed CeO(2) NPs was not due to reduced cell viability. This is the first study evaluating toxicity of nanoscale HfO(2), SiO(2), Al(2)O(3) and CeO(2) to S. cerevisiae. Overall the results obtained demonstrate that these nanomaterials display low or no toxicity to yeast.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?