An in-silico analysis of electrically evoked responses of midget and parasol retinal ganglion cells in different retinal regions
Xiaoyu Song,Shirong Qiu,Mohit N Shivdasani,Feng Zhou,Zhengyang Liu,Saidong Ma,Xinyu Chai,Yao Chen,Xuan Cai,Tianruo Guo,Liming Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ac5b18
IF: 5.043
2022-03-30
Journal of Neural Engineering
Abstract:Abstract Objective . Visual outcomes provided by present retinal prostheses that primarily target retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) through epiretinal stimulation remain rudimentary, partly due to the limited knowledge of retinal responses under electrical stimulation. Better understanding of how different retinal regions can be quantitatively controlled with high spatial accuracy, will be beneficial to the design of micro-electrode arrays and stimulation strategies for next-generation wide-view, high-resolution epiretinal implants. Approach . A computational model was developed to assess neural activity at different eccentricities (2 mm and 5 mm) within the human retina. This model included midget and parasol RGCs with anatomically accurate cell distribution and cell-specific morphological information. We then performed in silico investigations of region-specific RGC responses to epiretinal electrical stimulation using varied electrode sizes (5–210 μ m diameter), emulating both commercialized retinal implants and recently developed prototype devices. Main results . Our model of epiretinal stimulation predicted RGC population excitation analogous to the complex percepts reported in human subjects. Following this, our simulations suggest that midget and parasol RGCs have characteristic regional differences in excitation under preferred electrode sizes. Relatively central (2 mm) regions demonstrated higher number of excited RGCs but lower overall activated receptive field (RF) areas under the same stimulus amplitudes (two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), p < 0.05). Furthermore, the activated RGC numbers per unit active RF area (number-RF ratio) were significantly higher in central than in peripheral regions, and higher in the midget than in the parasol population under all tested electrode sizes (two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05). Our simulations also suggested that smaller electrodes exhibit a higher range of controllable stimulation parameters to achieve pre-defined performance of RGC excitation. An empirical model: I = a · exp ( b · D ) + c of the stimulus amplitude ( I )–electrode diameter ( D ) relationship was constructed to achieve the pre-defined objective function values in different retinal regions, indicating the ability of controlling retinal outputs by fine-tuning the stimulation amplitude with different electrode sizes. Finally, our multielectrode simulations predicted differential neural crosstalk between adjacent electrodes in central temporal and peripheral temporal regions, providing insights towards establishing a non-uniformly distributed multielectrode array geometry for wide-view retinal implants. Significance. Stimulus–response properties in central and peripheral retina can provide useful information to estimate electrode parameters for region-specific activation by retinal stimulation. Our findings support the possibility of improving the performance of epiretinal prostheses by exploring the influence of electrode array geometry on activation of different retinal regions.
engineering, biomedical,neurosciences