A novel predictive formula for highly accurate discrimination between truly Helicobacter pylori-uninfected and currently infected/spontaneously eradicated individuals for gastric cancer screening
Takako Takayama,Hideo Suzuki,Kosuke Okada,Shintaro Akiyama,Toshiaki Narasaka,Kazushi Maruo,Taku Sakamoto,Emiko Seo,Kiichiro Tsuchiya
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000036335
IF: 1.6
2024-03-13
Medicine
Abstract:The ABC classification, based on Helicobacter pylori (H pylori ) antibody titer detected via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and serum pepsinogen (PG) levels, is a valuable tool for distinguishing gastric cancer risk profiles. [ 1 , 2 ] This method requires categorization of the subjects into 4 groups: Group A ( H pylori antibody [−], PG [−]), Group B ( H pylori antibody [+], PG [−]), Group C ( H pylori antibody [+], PG [+]), and Group D ( H pylori antibody [−], PG [+]). Groups B, C, and D were reported to have higher gastric cancer risks compared to Group A. [ 3–5 ] However, the ABC classification carries false-negative possibilities in high-risk individuals who have been infected and experienced spontaneous eradication but are included in Group A. [ 6–8 ] Another problem is that, although cutoffs for H pylori antibody values based on ELISA for gastric cancer screening were previously determined as < 3 U/mL, cutoff values for the latex immunoassay (LIA) method, which has recently become widely used, are not yet established. According to the manufacturer instructions, the recommended cutoff value of 10 U/mL for the LZ test (Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) based on the LIA method was determined through an assessment of the outcomes from urea breath tests, with the aim of identifying a currently infected status. Therefore, we need to identify another cutoff value for gastric cancer screening. To detect high-risk individuals, including spontaneously eradicated status individuals, Inoue et al identified the cutoff value for this population (currently infected + previously infected [excluding post eradication]) versus the truly uninfected (determined by the LZ test) as 5.2 U/mL [ 9 ] while our previous study of 2 different populations reported values of 3 U/mL and < 3 U/mL, respectively. [ 10 , 11 ] It is essential to discriminate truly low-risk, uninfected individuals from currently infected/spontaneously eradicated cases who require endoscopy because of high gastric cancer risk.
medicine, general & internal