Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 11, November 2024. Background:Rotator cuff calcific tendinitis is a common shoulder joint disorder. Nonsurgical treatment methods, including multiple needling and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), can effectively treat calcific tendinitis.Purpose:To evaluate the clinical results and radiological outcomes of treatment with ultrasound-guided needling (UGN) alone versus UGN with high-energy ESWT (UGN-H) or UGN with low-energy ESWT (UGN-L) in patients with calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Outpatient records for patients with calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were grouped into those treated with UGN-H, UGN-L, or controls with UGN alone. The visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, Constant-Murley scores, and radiographic evaluation to assess calcification size were available before treatment and at 3, 6, and 12 months after the first treatment. Post event pairwise analysis to analyze score differences between treatment groups was used.Results:Overall, 130 patients were included for analysis (42 UGN-H, 44 UGN-L, and 44 with UGN alone). At 3 months, the VAS scores were UGN-H (4.13 ± 0.84; P < .001) and UGN-L (4.47 ± 1.01; P < .001) which were significantly better than UGN alone (5.35 ± 1.00) in terms of the VAS score; however, the difference was not significant between UGN-H and UGN-L. These differences persisted at months 6 and 12 (6 months: UGN-H, 2.66 ± 1.00; P < .001; UGN-L, 3.16 ± 1.05; P = .033; 12 months: UGN-H, 1.93 ± 0.43; P < .001; UGN-L, 2.04 ± 0.46; P < .001). The results of the ASES and Constant-Murley scores were similar to those of the VAS score. In terms of radiographic outcome, follow-up at months 3, 6, and 12 revealed that UGN-H and UGN-L were superior to UGN alone at removing calcification (median 95% CI; 3 months: UGN-H, 1.4 mm2 [1.08, 7.25 mm2); P = .002; UGN-L, 5.79 mm2 (1.17, 7.85 mm2]; P = .041; 6 months: UGN-H, 0.91 mm2 [0, 1.15 mm2); P < .001; UGN-L, 1.13 mm2 [0.84, 5.10 mm2]; P < .001; 12 months: UGN-H, 0 mm2 [0, 0 mm2]; P < .001; UGN-L, 0 mm2 (0, 4.33 mm2]; P = .023). There was no significant difference between UGN-H and UGN-L at the month 3 follow-up, but the month 6 and 12 follow-ups revealed that UGN-H was more effective at removing calcification compared with UGN-L.Conclusion:The study demonstrated that, for pain relief and recovery of shoulder joint function, UGN + ESWT was significantly superior to UGN alone. No significant difference was observed between different energy levels of ESWT. UGN + ESWT was significantly superior to UGN alone on radiographic evaluation. Furthermore, UGN-H performed better radiographically with reducing calcifications compared with UGN-L at 12 months.

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder

High-energy extracorporeal shock-wave therapy for calcifying tendinitis of the rotator cuff: a randomised trial

High-energy versus low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy for calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: which is superior? A meta-analysis

Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on the shoulder joint functional status of patients with calcific tendinitis

Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and kinesio taping in calcific tendinopathy of the shoulder: a randomized controlled trial

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment for Calcifying Tendinitis of the Shoulder: A Case Report and Literature Review

The midterm effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the management of chronic calcific shoulder tendinitis

Short-term outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of chronic non-calcific tendinopathy of the supraspinatus: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Clinical, sonographic and molecular changes in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder following extracorporeal shockwave therapy: a prospective case-control study

Prognostic factors for the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder

Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of shoulder calcific tendinitis

Extracorporeal Shock Wave in Combination with Arthroscopy for Calcified Supraspinatus Tendonitis

Clinical Study on Appropriate Energy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave for Rotator Cuff Non-calcific Tendinopathy Treatment

Effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in three major tendon diseases

Factors associated with resorption of calcific deposits in the shoulder with extracorporeal shock wave therapy

Needle aspiration of calcific deposits versus shock wave therapy for conservative therapy resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: protocol of a randomized, controlled trial

Ultrasound-Guided Needling Combined With High- or Low-Energy Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Needling Alone for Calcified Rotator Cuff: A Retrospective Study

Clinical improvement and resorption of calcifications in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder after shock wave therapy at 6 months' follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Influence of deposit stage and failed ESWT on the surgical results of arthroscopic treatment of calcifying tendonitis of the shoulder

Extracorporeal shockwaves therapy versus corticosteroid injection for the treatment of non-calcific rotator cuff tendinopathies: a randomized trial

Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and ultrasound-guided percutaneous lavage in reducing the pain of rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy; an updated systematic review and meta-analysis