Abstract:OBJECTIVES:This study overviewed the current database of studies on periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) to compare outcomes and antibiotic side effects in culture-negative or culture-positive PJIs and assess treatment options for culture-negative PJIs.PATIENTS AND METHODS:A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken using studies published before July 2022 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. All studies comparing treatment of culture-negative or -positive PJIs were included. Afterward, the infection control rate, periprosthetic or spacer fracture, hip joint or spacer dislocation, and antibiotic side effects in different treatment methods of PJI were analyzed.RESULTS:Eleven studies involving 1,747 patients were included. Most studies clearly defined the infection control criteria: no pain or swelling, no wound drainage, normal serology, and normal radiographic findings. Patients were followed until treatment failure, death, or until the last clinical visit without evidence of treatment failure. The two types of PJIs did not differ significantly in infection control rates (culture-negative PJI 79.2% vs. culture-positive PJI 76.6%; odds ratio [OR]=1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84 to 1.70), either after all types of surgical treatment or after two-stage revision arthroplasty (OR=1.12, 95% CI: 0.72 to 1.75), single-stage revision arthroplasty (OR=0.51, 95% CI: 0.19 to 1.37), or debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (OR=0.88, 95% CI: 0.50 to 1.54). Similarly, we did not find differences in periprosthetic or spacer fracture and hip joint or spacer dislocation. For culture-negative PJIs, the infection control rate was 85.2% after two-stage revision arthroplasty, 90.6% after single-stage revision arthroplasty, and 69.7% after debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention. Data pooled from three studies showed higher incidence of antibiotic side effects for culture-negative PJIs.CONCLUSION:The clinical outcomes of one-stage revision and two-stage revision are comparable. Therefore, both of them can be considered in surgical treatment for culture-negative PJIs. In addition, limited data showed a higher incidence of antibiotic side effects in culture-negative PJIs.

Efficacy and safety of two-stage revision for patients with culture-negative versus culture-positive periprosthetic joint infection: a single-center retrospective study

Comparable Outcome of Culture-Negative and Culture-Positive Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection for Patients Undergoing Two-Stage Revision

Treatment of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty

Comparable Clinical Outcomes of Culture-Negative and Culture-Positive Periprosthetic Joint Infections: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Outcomes of Culture-Negative or -Positive Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Impact of Culture Negativity on the Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Chronic PJI

Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-stage vs two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection: a call for a prospective randomized trial

Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection after knee arthroplasty: a call for a randomised trial

Retrospective Study from a Single Center to Identify Risk Factors Associated with Reinfection in Patients Undergoing 2-Stage Revision Surgery for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Results of two-stage revision for polymicrobial and methicillin-resistant infections of artificial joint prosthesis

The Proper Timing of Second-Stage Revision in Treating Periprosthetic Knee Infection: Reliable Indicators and Risk Factors.

Revision Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Post Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty of 34 Hospitals in China Between 2015 and 2017: a Multi-Center Survey

Two stage revision: indications, techniques and results

Microbiology of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infections in Surgically Revised Cases from 34 Centers in Mainland China

Failed 2-Stage Revision Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection-Patient Characteristics and Outcomes

Prosthetic spacers in two-stage revision for knee periprosthetic joint infection achieve better function and similar infection control

Management of the infected total hip or knee arthroplasty with two-staged revisions

What is the Appropriate Extended Duration of Antibiotic Prophylaxis after Two- Stage Revision for Chronic PJI?

Assessment of Microbiological and Clinical Findings of Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty Performed Due to Prosthetic Joint Infection

Comparable Results of Single and Two-Stage Exchange for Select Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection

[Cementless Two-Staged Total Hip Arthroplasty for Chronic Periprosthetic Infection].