Salt, processed meat and the risk of cancer

Jinfu Hu,Carlo La Vecchia,Howard Morrison,Eva Negri,Les Mery,Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Research Group,Bertha Paulse,Ron Dewar,Dagny Dryer,Nancy Kreiger,Heather Whittaker,Diane Robson,Shirley Fincham,Nhu Le
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3283429e32
Abstract:This study assesses the association between salt added at the table, processed meat and the risk of various cancers. Mailed questionnaires were completed by 19 732 patients with histologically confirmed incident cancer of the stomach, colon, rectum, pancreas, lung, breast, ovary, prostate, testis, kidney, bladder, brain, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or leukaemia, and 5039 population controls,between 1994 and 1997. Measurement included information on socioeconomic status, lifestyle habits and diet. A 69-item food frequency questionnaire provided data on eating habits 2 years before the study. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were derived through unconditional logistic regression. Compared with never adding salt at the table, always or often adding salt at the table was associated with an increased risk of stomach, lung, testicular and bladder cancer. Processed meat was significantly related to the risk of the stomach, colon, rectum, pancreas, lung, prostate, testis, kidney and bladder cancer and leukaemia; the odds ratios for the highest quartile ranged from 1.3 to 1.7. The findings add to the evidence that high consumption of salt and processed meat may play a role in the aetiology of several cancers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?